WELCOME to TRUTH ... not TASERS

You may have arrived here via a direct link to a specific post. To see the most recent posts, click HERE.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

What does a taser do to the human heart?

By Dayo Olopade | TheRoot.com

August 1, 2008--On January 17, 21-year-old Baron Pikes was stopped by the police. Nearly half a million volts of electricity later, he died on the street. Handcuffed, held down and stunned with a Taser-brand electro-weapon seven times before he died (and then twice more after that), Pikes' heart, the coroner notes, simply gave out. Amnesty International estimates that in the past seven years, 150 people have been killed after being shocked by stun guns like Tasers. But that's still a very small fraction of the population, even that fraction being stunned by police officers or worried civilians. So just how can a Taser—designed to be non-lethal force—kill you?

Tasers, often shaped like pistols, use compressed nitrogen to fire two darts at a target. The darts are connected to the gun by insulated wires that give it a range of up to 21 feet. Once the darts make a connection with a target, the Taser sends 50,000-volt electric pulses into the victim's body, causing intense muscle spasms and sharp pain. Seized, the victim often falls to the ground.

While 50,000 volts sounds like a lot, humans are actually able to conduct electricity—which is why we tend to steer clear of open sockets or stick forks into toasters that could give us a nasty shock. But despite the high voltage of a Taser's current, the relatively low amperage on the device is what allows it to immobilize but not kill you. (Being struck by lightning, by comparison, kills frequently because it sends an exponentially greater amount of voltage and amperage through a victim, at levels that our bodies just can't handle.)

Still, Taser shocks are dangerous in general because they interfere with the most important muscle in the body—the heart. When your heart beats normally, it is, like the rest of the body, already in the process of conducting electricity. The biological process that lets your heart rhythmically contract and pump blood represents "electricity going to the heart in an organized way," says cardiologist Abraham Kocheril, a specialist in electrophysiology at the University of Illinois at Chicago. So if someone gets a mini-jolt of electricity from the outside, be it from a live socket or a hospital defibrillator, they'll probably live.

But the shock had better be at the right place and the right time. Each time the heart beats, it charges and discharges stored electricity. In between contractions, the heart automatically goes into a brief recovery mode called diastole. In that tiny window of recovery time, a sudden jolt of electricity could cause the heart muscle to go into ventricular fibrillation (VF), which is essentially the first stage of a heart attack. The heart begins to pump erratically, if at all, and blood pressure drops to nothing, leaving no oxygen available for brain and body cells.

The effects of any major disruptions during this brief diastolic window can be swift and catastrophic. When young children are hit by a baseball or athletes are struck forcefully in the chest, these blows can be transduced into an electric jolt. If these shocks occur while the victim's heart happens to be vulnerable, the rhythm is disturbed and the body goes into VF, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or cardiac arrest. This possibility is the most common explanation of sudden, sports-related deaths.

So what about Baron Pikes? Well, if somebody is prone to dying suddenly or has a weak heart, then a 50,000-volt stress would precipitate it. Some prior Taser deaths, such as one in Fayetteville, N.C., occurred because the victim was in an altered state, on drugs. Another death, in Colorado, was chalked up to the vigorous foot chase that preceded the police's use of the Taser. But people at risk of this outcome are typically those who have had heart disease, heart failure or certain congenital abnormalities.

In the case of Pikes, a healthy 21-year-old, the initial six shocks probably got him at a time when his heart was contracting, and he was not adversely affected (beyond the muscle spasms, confusion and immobility). Cuffed on the ground and in the back of a squad car, he would not have been exerting himself—nor were there more than trace amounts of drugs in his system. But that seventh time, the Taser more than likely hit Pikes' heart when it was in diastole, sending him into VF and toward sudden death.

Once a person is in VF, spontaneous recovery is rare. Ironically, the solution to the problem is to administer another electric shock—well-known to provide instant theatrics for so many network hospital dramas. In one reported case, a man was Tased while suffering from atrial fibrillation (which affects the upper chamber of the heart, not the part responsible for pumping blood. The Taser shock turned out to be therapeutic, bringing his heart back into correct rhythm. In Pikes' case, the police did continue to Tase him, without the happy ending. The coroner's report states that the last two shocks were administered after he was dead.

So the Taser, while marketed as an effective way to stop a bad guy cold without killing—and even, at times, as a women's fashion accessory—is actually a form of physiological Russian roulette. The odds of the unthinkable increase the more times one is subjected to the powerful electric current. Cruelly, Pikes made it through six rounds, which would have emptied a gun clip in a real game of chance. Tase me once, shame on me. Tase me nine times—well, the odds aren't good.

Dayo Olopade is a reporter at the New Republic.

High profile Victoria police chief quits, discipline hearing cancelled

August 14, 2008
The Canadian Press

VICTORIA — Victoria is looking for a new police chief after the city's mayor announced the immediate resignation of embattled former chief Paul Battershill under mysterious circumstances.

Battershill has been on paid administrative leave since last October and was facing a disciplinary hearing next Monday, but what prompted the leave has never been made public.

Mayor Alan Lowe said Wednesday that Battershill's resignation means the hearing has been cancelled. Lowe wouldn't give details about what's behind Battershill's departure.

"I would like to announce today that the (Victoria Police) board has accepted the resignation of Paul Battershill effective immediately as a result of a loss of confidence in his leadership of the Victoria Police Department," said Lowe during a press conference at Victoria Police headquarters.

"The disciplinary hearing set for Aug. 18 will no longer proceed due to the resignation of Battershill," he said. "The police board will not be paying a severance to Battershill. We will contribute a sum of $15,000 towards Battershill's legal fees as part of the settlement agreement. The Victoria Police Board considers this matter closed."

But Lowe suggested the Battershill matter could still face public scrutiny. The office of B.C.'s police complaints commissioner is entitled to review the findings of an RCMP investigation it ordered and has the power under the Police Act to call a public hearing, he said. "A public hearing could be held if (the commissioner's) office believes that the issues are such that they are in the public interest," Lowe said.

Police Complaints Commissioner Dirk Ryneveld was not immediately available for comment.

Lowe said an RCMP investigation of the allegations, which were never made public, against Battershill found nothing criminal against the former chief. "The investigation completed by the RCMP did not find that Battershill had committed any criminal acts, had any involvement with any criminal activity, nor did it find any financial impropriety," he said.

Lowe did say the allegations against Battershill were a personnel matter, but refused to go further. Lowe said Battershill's annual salary was $167,000.

The mayor defended the actions of the Victoria Police Board, saying the board was looking to protect taxpayers with regards to the Battershill matter. "We as a police board have acted very appropriately and we are looking after the best interests of the taxpayers," he said. "There are some things within the last nine-and-a-half months that we are unable to disclose only due to the fact that we are bound by the settlement agreement at this time."

Lowe said he believes the police board had no other choice but to suspend Battershill.

Deputy Chief Bill Naughton will remain as interim chief, said Lowe, but the police board has already hired a firm to begin looking for a new chief, who should be hired by November. Naughton said the issues involving the chief proved challenging for the department's rank-and-file members, but the officers never wavered from their duties to the public. "This department has a long and proud history," he said. "The record of accomplishment since October speaks for itself," said Naughton, citing several successful police operations, including the arrest of suspects in connection with a deadly downtown shooting. Naughton said he has not seen the investigation reports on Battershill. He would not say if he will apply for the chief's position.

Battershill, a 20-year Vancouver city police veteran, became Victoria's chief constable in 1999. He was known for supporting innovative policing techniques and led high-profile reviews on the use of Taser stun guns by police and an investigation into alcohol-related incidents at the West Vancouver Police Department.

Ryneveld ordered the RCMP to conduct an investigation under the Police Act but refused to disclose the reason. The entire matter was under a news blackout until a sensitive legal document was leaked to the media last November.

Victoria lawyer David Mulroney said at the time he wrote a letter to the law firm that represents the police department suggesting possible conflicts of interest surrounding the police chief and his knowledge of freedom of information requests involving himself. Mulroney said he represents a client who filed several freedom of information requests that name Battershill and suggested a link between his client's information request and the RCMP's investigation.

The access requests targeted four areas, including the Victoria police department's dismissals without cause, suspensions with pay, expense accounts and employment contracts involving pay equity.

One package of documents Mulroney's client received revealed Battershill had credit card expenses of more than $90,000 since 2004. The documents also show the city paid up to $600,000 in severance to former police department members and officials. The request also asked for all expense and accounting records of the two high-profile reports compiled by Battershill. Mulroney has yet to receive those documents. He asked for all expenses and accounts from the Taser Technology Review conducted by Battershill and its preliminary recommendations in September 2004.

It also asked for all expenses and accounts relating to Battershill's investigation of Const. Lisa of the West Vancouver Police Department on behalf of the B.C. Police Complaints Commissioner.

Taser firm sponsoring police chiefs conference

Taser International has also paid $25,000 to sponsor the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in November 2008 in San Diego.

"Take advantage of this unique opportunity available to only one company to sponsor all of the aisle signs in the exhibit hall. Each aisle sign is 4’ x 10’ and will display the aisle number along with the sponsor’s logo and booth number on the bottom in a 4’ x 4’ area. Over 50 aisle signs with your company’s information will be hung above the exhibit floor making this a tremendous exposure opportunity.
Available Sponsorship: 1 , Sold: 1 Cost: $25,000.00"


August 14, 2008
JOHN COTTER, The Canadian Press

Taser International is a major sponsor of a coming police chiefs conference where new research into electronic stun gun safety will be presented.

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police commissioned a review of conducted-energy weapons last fall after Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski died at Vancouver International Airport when he was hit with the device by RCMP. At least five other Canadians have since died after being tasered by police.

Steve Palmer, executive director of the Canadian Police Research Centre, said he will present an overview of the report at the conference this month in Montreal, but said the full review of the weapons commonly known as tasers is not yet complete.

"It's an update," said Mr. Palmer, who declined to give details. A final report is expected by next year after a full and independent peer review.

Called RESTRAINT (Risk of Death in Subjects That Resist), the review compares tasers with other methods police use to subdue difficult people.

It also looks at the characteristics of those who have been zapped, including excited delirium, a condition in which suspects are in a heart-pounding state of agitation. Excited delirium has been repeatedly cited to explain the sudden deaths of people after being tasered.

Taser International is one of the platinum sponsors of the conference that runs Aug. 24-27. The corporation has sponsored similar events in Canada and around the world.

For a minimum $25,000 fee, platinum sponsors can display their name on banners and signs, provide promotional items in delegate kits, be given an advance list of participants and attend conference sessions.

Steve Tuttle, vice-president of Arizona-based Taser International, said the company's presence is important. "You have to be there. It is a major sales event. It is advertising," said Mr. Tuttle, who will be at the conference to answer questions about his company's products.

Mr. Tuttle said that, while the new Canadian research is important, he has DVDs that contain 130 studies that have found the devices to be safe. "You want to be there to be a conduit for information because clearly we have controversial issues in Canada, and the last thing that we want to be is shy. We stand behind our technology."

Hilary Homes of Amnesty International Canada, which has called for a moratorium on stun guns, said having Taser as a sponsor and exhibitor sends a mixed message. "It is very troubling," Ms. Homes said from Ottawa. "What we need now is an objective discussion and accountability, and this doesn't seem to be creating the proper context for what needs to be a very frank and open debate."

Officials with the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police were not available for comment.

Taser staff will be on hand to exhibit the company's trademark X26 model used by the RCMP and other Canadian police forces. Taser is not listed as an exhibitor under its own name, but under its Canadian distributor, M.D. Charlton Co. Ltd.

The company will also be promoting new products such as a wireless taser round that is fired from a shotgun and has a range of 20 metres, he said. There will also be information on new products being developed, including a system called Shockwave that fires multiple taser rounds that can incapacitate a number of people in an area up to 100 metres.

A special video camera and audio device that police can wear to show what happens when an officer restrains someone is also in the works. A video of Mr. Dziekanski's death that was shot by a member of the public made headlines around the world, but there was no police video of the encounter.

Media Advisory - Canadian Association of Police Boards Conference

Strange that Taser International is *not* a sponsor of this conference.

August 14, 2008

TORONTO, Aug. 14 /CNW Telbec/ - Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day, former Commissioner of the OPP, Gwen Boniface, and Toronto Chief of Police William Blair, are among the speakers scheduled to address policing governors from across Canada at their annual conference beginning Friday at the Toronto Hilton, 145 Richmond Street West.

Some 200 delegates are expected for the two and a half days of sessions of the Canadian Association of Police Boards (CAPB). Minister Day is scheduled to speak after a luncheon on Friday, August 15 while Chief Blair will address conference delegates at the Saturday evening banquet.

The conference theme is 'Civilian Governance and Social Responsibility: Safety, Community and Sustainability'. Glen Murray will reflect on civilian police governance facing a changing urban landscape and Thomas Homer-Dixon's session is entitled 'The Upside of Down: Complex Forces at Work in Our World'. Other sessions will explore greening of police services, the use of Tasers by police officers, issues of ethics and accountability and police chiefs' and police associations' expectations of police boards and commissions.

During the association's Saturday business meeting, delegates will debate eight resolutions ranging from advocating for stricter penalties for crimes of violence involving knives to the creation of a conducted energy weapon working group and a request for immediate action on lawful access. Approved resolutions are forwarded to the federal government for action.

CAPB is made up of volunteer members of police commissions and boards across Canada that provide civilian governance and oversight of municipal police.

Former cop indicted in taser death in Louisiana

August 13, 2008
By Howard Witt, Chicago Tribune

NEW ORLEANS - Ruling in a racially explosive case that some forensic experts have described as police torture, a grand jury in the small Louisiana town of Winnfield indicted a white police officer Wednesday on charges of manslaughter and official malfeasance for repeatedly shocking a handcuffed black suspect with a Taser device, resulting in the man's death due to cardiac arrest.

After two days of closed testimony, Winn Parish District Atty. Chris Nevils announced that the grand jury had indicted Scott Nugent, 21, for the death in January of Baron "Scooter" Pikes, 21, while in police custody. Two other Winnfield police officers who were present during the incident were not charged.

Nugent, who was fired from the police force in May, could face up to 45 years in prison if convicted on the charges. He surrendered to sheriff's deputies immediately after the indictment was issued, a spokesman for Nevils said, and a $45,000 bond was set.

"It is our intention to show at trial that Mr. Nugent caused the death of Baron Pikes by 'Tasing' him multiple times, unnecessarily and in violation of Louisiana law, and by failing to get him medical attention when it was apparent he needed it," Nevils said in a statement. "In a civilized society, abuse by those who are given great authority cannot be tolerated."

Nugent's attorney has said previously that his client was following police procedures during Pikes' arrest.

Pikes, wanted on a drug possession warrant, was apprehended and handcuffed Jan. 17 after a foot chase. Although Nugent's police report of the incident stated that Pikes did not resist or struggle after being handcuffed, the officer administered nine 50,000-volt Taser shocks to Pikes' body after he was slow to respond to Nugent's order to stand up.

Witnesses said Pikes pleaded with Nugent to stop Tasering him. But within 39 minutes after he was first subdued, Pikes was dead.

Winnfield police claimed that Pikes told them during the incident that he suffered from asthma and was high on PCP and crack cocaine. But Winn Parish Coroner Dr. Randolph Williams found no evidence of such drugs in Pikes' system or any sign that he suffered from asthma. He ruled Pikes' death a homicide and noted that Pikes was unconscious when the last two Taser shocks were administered, after he had been loaded into a squad car and delivered to the police station.

Both Williams and Dr. Michael Baden, a nationally prominent forensic pathologist who reviewed the case, said the incident "could be considered to be torture."

The Pikes' case, first recounted in the Tribune in July, aroused fears of a cover-up among family members and civil rights groups because Winnfield, the birthplace of Louisiana Govs. Huey and Earl Long, has a long history of political corruption.

Nevils' predecessor as district attorney committed suicide amid allegations that he had skimmed $200,000 from his office accounts and demanded payoffs from criminal suspects. The former police chief, who was Nugent's father, also killed himself, after losing a close election campaign marred by fraud allegations. The current police chief was convicted of drug possession as a young man and was pardoned by former Louisiana Gov. Edwin Edwards, who is now serving a federal prison sentence for corruption while in office.

Earlier this week, the mother of Pikes' 4-year-old son filed a wrongful-death suit in federal court against Nugent, Winnfield city officials and Taser International Inc. The suit accuses city officials of civil rights violations in Pikes' death.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

RCMP taser trainer guilty of assault with stun gun

August 13, 2008
Susan Lazaruk, The Province

An RCMP officer who trains other officers in the use of Tasers has been found guilty of assault in 100 Mile House while using a stun gun.

Const. Dan Cameron was found guilty in provincial court after a four-day trial. He remains on active duty awaiting sentencing and also faces possible internal discipline.

Cameron responded to a disturbance outside Jake's Bar early on Dec. 17, 2006, and ordered Kevin Campbell, a shirtless, drunken patron who had been swearing at another officer, to get out of a vehicle or he would be hit with 50,000 volts of electricity, according to court documents.

Cameron said he had been told there was a fight outside the bar and thought Campbell was involved in it and so had reasonable grounds to arrest him. Campbell was combative and resisted arrest, according to testimony, so Cameron used the Taser against him.

Judge Lynne Dollis ruled that Cameron didn't have reasonable and probable grounds to arrest Campbell for causing a disturbance for fighting and therefore "was not acting in the execution of his duty when he applied the Taser to Mr. Campbell and is guilty of assaulting Mr. Campbell with a weapon, a Taser."

RCMP spokesman Sgt. Tim Shields said the force will have a "code of conduct investigation" to determine if any discipline is necessary against Cameron, which could range from verbal reprimand to dismissal.

He said the incident would not affect RCMP Taser policy because the issue in this case was improper arrest and not improper use of the stun gun.

RCMP officers will have to appear before taser inquiry

August 13, 2008
Chad Skelton, Canwest News Service

VANCOUVER - The four RCMP officers who Tasered Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski will almost certainly appear before the inquiry into his death when it resumes this October, inquiry lawyer Art Vertlieb said Tuesday.

Under B.C.'s Public Inquiry Act, retired judge Thomas Braidwood, who is heading the inquiry, has the power to force the officers to testify.

However, Vertlieb said he doesn't think that will be necessary. "We're confident the RCMP is going to want to co-operate in a voluntary way," said Vertlieb. "This is a totally independent commission and this is the best opportunity for people to tell the commission what happened."

Dziekanski died at Vancouver International Airport on Oct. 14, 2007, shortly after being Tasered by RCMP officers.

The integrated homicide investigation team completed its investigation into Dziekanski's death in June and forwarded its report to Crown counsel.

None of the officers has been charged.

On June 25, Braidwood wrapped up the first "study" phase of his inquiry, which looked at how police use Tasers in general. Braidwood heard from about 50 presenters and received more than 40 written submissions.

On Oct. 20, the second phase of the inquiry will begin, looking specifically at the circumstances of Dziekanski's death. The second phase, unlike the first, gives Braidwood the power to make findings of misconduct against individuals, and to order people to testify before him.

On Tuesday, the inquiry officially began accepting applications from those who want to appear before it.

However, Vertlieb noted several agencies have already expressed an interest in appearing, including the Polish government, the Canada Border Services Agency, the B.C. Ambulance Service, the Vancouver airport, the RCMP and Richmond Fire-Rescue.

Inquiry representative Chris Freimond said not all those who apply will be allowed to appear. "They have to have some constructive input," said Freimond.

The second phase of the inquiry is expected to last six weeks, though it could go longer.

Braidwood's report covering the first phase of the inquiry is scheduled to be delivered to B.C. Attorney General Wally Oppal on Nov. 30.

The report on the second phase of the inquiry will likely be completed some time in 2009.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Taser International a major sponsor of the 2008 Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police conference

I guess I spoke too soon - Taser International IS, once again, a platinum sponsor of the annual conference of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police. I should have known it was too reasonable (see below) to be true. So much for progressive change.

Originally posted on June 26, 2008:

Taser International NOT a major sponsor of the 2008 Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police conference

Back in November, I made some noise here about Taser International's major sponsorship of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police annual conference. My opinion was that this posed an enormous conflict of interest and compromised the Association's integrity.

I first noticed the strange phenomenon of Taser International's sponsorship of this particular conference in 2004, the year my brother died.

Although many companies are listed as conference sponsors of the 2008 conference, Taser International is conspicuously *not*.

The Association's tagline is "Leading Progressive Change in Policing".

Is this progressive change, or what?

Grand jury weighs charges in taser death

August 12, 2008
Associated Press

WINNFIELD, La. (AP) - A grand jury in central Louisiana is probing the death of a man who was handcuffed when a police officer repeatedly jolted him with a Taser. Winn Parish District Attorney Chris Nevils convened the grand jury Tuesday to consider criminal charges against former Winnfield police officer Scott Nugent in the death of 21-year-old Baron Pikes. A spokesman for Nevils said the grand jury could wrap up its probe by the end of the day. Pikes was shocked nine times with a 50,000-volt Taser as he was arrested on a drug possession warrant in January.

Nugent was fired but is appealing his dismissal. Nugent's lawyer says his client followed department protocols and didn't use excessive force. A coroner has ruled that Pikes' death was a homicide.

taser targets lucky they weren't shot

August 12, 2008
Raise a Little Hell with Tom Brodbeck
The Winnipeg Sun

The 42-year-old man who fell on his head after being Tasered by police over the weekend was lucky he wasn’t shot with a Glock. If information by police is correct that the suspect refused to drop his knife, police may have been within their rights to shoot him.

A Taser is considered an intermediate weapon that falls into the same category as batons and pepper spray. According to an RCMP use-of-force expert from B.C. who testified at the Dumas inquest, intermediate weapons are not supposed to be used by police when suspects come after them with sharp objects.

They’re supposed to draw their service pistols.

The reason for that is Tasers aren’t fool proof. I believe the expert said they work in about 80% of cases. Which means if an officer’s life is in danger, they can’t rely on an 80% success rate. They need a reliable means of stopping the threat at that point and the only option is a firearm.

The expert was asked at the inquest whether a Taser would have been a viable option for Const. Dennis Gburek, who shot Dumas (if Tasers were available to Winnipeg police in 2005). He said it would not have been an option, especially in the winter when the success rate falls even further because of heavier clothing.

So these guys brandishing knives should count their lucky stars they were only Tasered. They probably should have been shot.

Dutch police to use "stroomstootwapen" in trial period

Here's our Dutch lesson for today: A taser by any other name is still potentially lethal. But, in Dutch, it almost sounds like a toy: "stroomstootwapen."

"The Taser is to be used as an alternative to firearms." Gee, where have we heard THAT before?! Here's a new term for the next Dutch dictionary - according to Yahoo! Babel Fish translation, "usage creep" in Dutch is "gebruiks kruipen."

"The manufacturer of the electroshock gun denied that the shocks are lethal. Jelle Egas, a spokesperson for the Dutch Council of Police Chiefs, said that a dog bite or a bean bag shot causes more injuries." Hey, according to the manufacturer, the taser is safer than TYLENOL. Funny how I can't find any record of 367+ people dropping dead from Tylenol! Looks like the Dutch police have bought the propaganda - lock, stock and barrel.


August 12, 2008
xinhuanet.com

BRUSSELS, Aug. 12 (Xinhua) -- Special Dutch police teams will use electroshock weapons by the brand name "Taser" for a trial period of one year, Dutch papers reported Tuesday.

The Taser gun disables its targets by giving them a 50,000-volt electric shock. Six police squads and a military police team will take part in the trial which starts around New Year's Eve.

Dutch Interior Minister Guusje Ter Horst will decide whether the electroshock guns will become part of the regular equipment of the special squads after the trial period.

The Taser is to be used as an alternative to firearms. It fires two hooks connected to the Taser gun by leads which temporarily paralyze a victim within eight meters of the shooting, making it much easier to arrest aggressive suspects. The Taser gun has been in use in the United States for years, but has received a lot of criticism. Amnesty International has reported that 200 individuals worldwide were killed after one or several electro-shocks had been administered.

The manufacturer of the electroshock gun denied that the shocks are lethal. Jelle Egas, a spokesperson for the Dutch Council of Police Chiefs, said that a dog bite or a bean bag shot causes more injuries.

The Dutch police chiefs have been urging for the procurement of electroshock guns since 2006. "A lot of research has been conducted in America, England and Canada. We have studied these reports and now want to test the guns," said a spokesperson of the Interior Ministry.

North Carolina man hospitalized after tasing

Boy, do I count myself lucky that I didn't end up in the neuro intensive care unit after I fell and banged my head on the rock-hard, frozen-solid ICE at the skating rink last winter!! I could have used a couple of extra-strength Tylenol except that I heard somewhere that they were less safe than tasers.

August 12, 2008
By Richard Gould | Hickory Daily Record

Michael Douglas Connor, 25, of Hickory is in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit at Frye Regional Medical Center after being Tasered by a Hickory police officer Monday.

Hickory Police Capt. Clyde Deal said Connor ignored verbal commands and ran after the officer tried to serve an outstanding warrant for drug and alcohol related charges. The officer caught him on Ninth Ave. and fired his Taser, Deal said.

The suspect again refused to cooperate with the officer and a second 50,000 jolt was delivered. The second charge caused Connor to fall to the ground and hit his head on a railroad tie, Deal said.

Two other recent Taser incidents involving police - one in Statesville and one in Charlotte - resulted in the deaths of two suspects.

Dziekanski inquiry gears up for second phase

August 12, 2008
Chad Skelton, Vancouver Sun

VANCOUVER - Those wanting to appear before the inquiry into the death of Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski must apply before Sept. 5, the inquiry announced Tuesday.

On June 25, retired judge Thomas Braidwood wrapped up the first phase of his inquiry, which looked at the general issue of how police use Tasers. Braidwood heard from about 50 presenters and received more than 40 written submissions.

On Oct. 20, the second phase of the inquiry, looking specifically at the circumstances surrounding Dziekanski's death, will begin. Dziekanski died at the Vancouver International Airport on Oct. 14 shortly after being Tasered by RCMP officers.

Details of how to apply to appear before the inquiry are available online at www.braidwoodinquiry.ca. Applicants must detail their expertise and explain why they believe they have something to add. Inquiry spokesman Chris Freimond said not all those who apply will be allowed to appear. "They have to have some constructive input," said Freimond. Those wanting to appear before the inquiry have until Sept. 5 to apply. Written submissions on policy issues will be accepted until Nov. 28. The second phase of the inquiry is expected to last six weeks, though it could go longer.

Braidwood's report covering the first phase of the inquiry is scheduled to be delivered to B.C. Attorney-General Wally Oppal on Nov. 30.

The report on the second phase of the inquiry will likely be completed some time in 2009.

Taser guidelines needed

August 12, 2008
Ian Robertson, Toronto Sun

Toronto's police bosses are seeking support from colleagues across Canada to set standards for the use of Tasers by officers coast-to-coast.

Criticism of the high-voltage alternatives to guns used by police to subdue unruly suspects has intensified since the recent deaths of two men.

"The problem is there is different training standards and different reporting procedures," said Dr. Alok Mukherjee, chairman of the Toronto Police Services Board.

While many police boards have set guidelines for officers, as Toronto did, some have no standards and others left the matter of Taser use to their police chiefs, he said. The issue became particularly controversial after the deaths of an irate traveller at Vancouver International Airport Oct. 14, 2008, and an accused 17-year-old thief in Winnipeg on July 22. In Toronto's most recent Tasering, an almost-naked 38-year-old upset when city workers tried to raze a shed at his Secord Ave. home was jolted by police. He was later accused of threatening to kill police with a machete.

The Toronto board's recommendation for a working group to study nation-wide standards will be one of eight topics of a conference here this weekend. About 200 delegates are due at the Canadian Association of Police Boards conference, starting Friday at the Toronto Hilton Hotel.

Lawsuit filed over taser death

August 12, 2008
MICHAEL KUNZELMAN, The Associated Press

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The family of a central Louisiana man who died after a police officer repeatedly jolted him with a Taser filed a wrongful-death lawsuit Monday, on the eve of a grand jury's probe of the case.

The federal lawsuit accuses Winnfield city officials of civil rights violations in the death of Baron Pikes, 21. Former Winnfield police officer Scott Nugent is accused of shocking a handcuffed Pikes nine times with a 50,000-volt Taser stun gun while arresting him on a drug possession warrant in January. A coroner ruled the death was a homicide.

A grand jury in Winnfield is scheduled to convene Tuesday and could finish hearing evidence in the case by the end of the day, according to a spokesman for Winn Parish District Attorney Chris Nevils.

Taser International Inc. is named as a defendant in the lawsuit filed Monday by Latrina Thomas, who is the mother of Pikes' 4-year-old son.

Thomas also is suing the city of Winnfield, its mayor, city council, police chief and several police officers, including Nugent. The lawsuit seeks unspecified punitive and compensatory damages, plus fees and expenses.

"It's about justice," said Carol Powell Lexing, a lawyer for Pikes' family. "You can't bring (Pikes) back, but this can hold those responsible accountable for their actions."

Nugent was fired in May, but he is appealing his dismissal. Nugent's lawyer, Phillip Terrell, said his client followed department protocols and didn't use excessive force. "It's a tragedy any way you look at it," Terrell said Friday.

Terrell said he hadn't seen the lawsuit, but he echoed the suit's allegation that Winnfield failed to properly supervise and train its officers. "If there's any culpability here, it's on Winnfield for not properly training police officers," Terrell said.

Nevils, whose office received a copy of a state police report on Pikes' death last month, said his decision to take the case to a grand jury also was based on information that his office gathered "independently." Terrell said he doesn't expect his client to testify before the grand jury.

Winnfield is about 40 miles northwest of Jena, where thousands of demonstrators gathered last year to protest the criminal cases against six black teenagers who were charged with beating a white student at a high school.

Like the so-called "Jena Six" case, race has figured into the aftermath of the Winnfield case. Pikes was black; Nugent is white. Powell Lexing has accused city officials of trying to cover up a racially motivated case of police brutality.

Racial tensions aren't the only parallel between the two cases. Mychal Bell, one of the Jena Six, is a first cousin of Pikes, according to Powell Lexing.

Monday, August 11, 2008

B.C. RCMP officer found guilty of assault in 2006 taser incident


Const. Dan Cameron leaves court on August 11 (photo by Kendall Waters)



Am I READING this right?!?! "A provincial court judge ruled that while use of the taser WAS NOT EXCESSIVE, police DID NOT HAVE GROUNDS TO ARREST THE MAN in the first place, so Cameron's use of the stun gun WAS NOT WARRANTED."

Police had NO GROUNDS TO ARREST the man but USED A TASER when it was NOT WARRANTED. That's one of the DEFINITIONS of excessive force! This judge ought to find somewhere else to remember the good old days.

As for MR. Cameron remaining on active duty ... Mr. Kennedy? Mr. Elliott? Mr. Day? Would somebody PLEASE get this officer off our streets?!


August 11, 2008
The Canadian Press

100 MILE HOUSE, B.C. — A B.C. Mountie has been convicted of assault with a Taser stemming from a police call to a pub in 100 Mile House.

Const. Dan Cameron will be sentenced at a later date for the December 2006 incident. Cameron and two other officers were called to a pub on Highway 97, and arrested the man who was hit with the stun gun.

A provincial court judge ruled that while use of the Taser was not excessive, police did not have grounds to arrest the man in the first place, so Cameron's use of the stun gun was not warranted.

Cameron's sentencing hearing will be scheduled for sometime next month. An RCMP spokesperson says Cameron remains on active duty at the 100 Mile House detachment until after sentencing and the outcome of a formal internal disciplinary hearing.


Oh look - here's another heartwarming story about RCMP use of this life-saving technology.

Man in hospital after hit with Taser by Winnipeg police

"the suspect was shot with a Taser and fell backwards, hitting his head on the sidewalk ... the man was taken to hospital in critical condition, but has since been upgraded to stable."

The taser manufacturer and their fan club will take umbrage at the title of this news report. They will insist the headline should have read "saved by the taser" or somesuch. Speaking to the Braidwood Inquiry, Tom Smith, Chairman of Taser International said, "Are Tasers risk free? No, they cause people to FALL DOWN."

Ooooh, what a LUCKY MAN this unnamed man was! I hope he buys a lottery ticket - to be an unwitting pawn in a deadly game of RUSSIAN ROULETTE and live to tell about it!

The Winnipeg Police Service, on the other hand, is up shit's creek.

tasers "fail" ... people die

On August 2nd, Craig McDougall was shot to death after a Winnipeg Police taser failed. (To see some *mostly* intelligent debate among Canadians, be sure to read the "Comments" on that page.)

tasers "work" ... people die

Just over a week earlier, on July 22nd, members of the Winnipeg Police Service were along for the ride when seventeen-year-old Michael Langan crossed the finish line. Oops - they forgot to tell his MOM!


August 11, 2008
By THE CANADIAN PRESS

WINNIPEG — A man was recovering in hospital Monday after being hit with a Taser by Winnipeg police. It was the latest in a number of confrontations in which city police have said they were forced to fire an electronic stun gun on a suspect who refused to drop a weapon.

“Unfortunately, our members are finding themselves in situations like this more and more often,” Const. Jason Michalyshen said. “If those officers deem that their safety and other people’s safety is being jeopardized ... an electronic control device is certainly a tool that members of the police service will deploy.”

Police were called to a disturbance at a home early Sunday and encountered a 42-year-old male suspect who refused to put down a knife, Michalyshen said. The suspect was shot with a Taser and fell backwards, hitting his head on the sidewalk, he said. The man was taken to hospital in critical condition, but has since been upgraded to stable.

Winnipeg police have faced criticism this summer over how they’ve responded to situations. Michael Langan, 17, died after being Tasered in July. Police said that he, too, refused to drop a knife. On Aug. 2, an officer fatally shot Craig McDougall, 26, with a gun after officers said he refused repeated demands to drop a knife.

McDougall’s death prompted native leaders to call for a public inquiry into how the Winnipeg Police Service deals with aboriginals. Manitoba Attorney General Dave Chomiak rejected that demand, saying each death would be subject to a judicial inquest under provincial law.

Are stun guns too deadly? Louisiana case adds to debate

Even The Christian Science Monitor wonders how all these people are being promoted to heaven!

August 11, 2008
Patrik Jonsson, The Christian Science Monitor

ATLANTA - A grand jury in rural Louisiana considers Tuesday whether to bring murder charges against a Taser-wielding police officer in what may become a seminal case in the hotly debated history of stun guns.

No US jury has ever convicted a police officer in connection with a death related to use of an electroshock weapon. But the number of deaths in which the guns have played a role has been growing, along with their use in law enforcement agencies.

Now, the coroner in Winnfield, La., has found the death of one Baron "Scooter" Pikes to be homicide by Taser, intensifying a simmering controversy over the devices and exposing the tense tug of war between police and young black men in rural Louisiana.

After Winnfield Parish police took Mr. Pikes, who is black, into custody one January morning, a white police officer fired a Taser, jolting Pikes nine times in the span of 14 minutes. Pikes never woke up.

Police said the 21-year-old Pikes was on drugs and uncooperative, but coroner Randolph Williams took a different view. In a report last month, he said he found no signs of a physical struggle, of drugs, or of any medical condition that could have exacerbated the jolts' effect.

As police departments across the US look for nonlethal ways to subdue out-of-control people, a big question is whether such devices reduce violence or, in effect, can increase the likelihood of violence, even torture. The Pikes death is just one case, but it appears to show that the combination of simmering racial tensions and insufficient police training can be lethal when injected with a 50,000-volt jolt.

"If the Taser was indeed the cause of death, this could be an interesting case," says Andrew Scott, former police chief of Boca Raton, Fla., who has testified on the behalf of officers in stun-gun cases. "Given the historical corruption of law enforcement in the area, and the fact that the young man was tased nine times, something is definitely wrong with this picture."

Two-thirds of all police departments in the US own at least one electroshock weapon. The guns have played a role in nearly 300 deaths in the US and Canada since their introduction in 1998, Amnesty International reported in June. Yet most wrongful-death lawsuits have gone the Taser's way, with juries finding that factors ranging from hard drugs in a person's system to existing medical conditions were responsible for or contributed to their deaths.

The weapons, also called electronic control devices, are part of a transformation in policing, away from bullets and guns and toward "Star Trek"-like devices that can, from a law-enforcement standpoint, safely and quickly defuse volatile situations.

"We didn't get this [negative] reaction when nightsticks were used to split heads open, but because of the technology and what it does, the media have really exacerbated the issue of the Taser," says Mr. Scott. "The upside of the Taser far outweighs the unfortunate abuse or downside."

But with some 260,000 units in the hands of law enforcement officials, and with no major federal regulation governing their use, stun-gun use in cases like the one in Louisiana is revealing unintended drawbacks of this particular tool of policing, says Thomas Luka, a defense attorney in Orlando, Fla. Used most often before officers are physically threatened, the devices are changing the relationship between police and the populace, especially on the streets.

"We're seeing injuries that wouldn't normally happen on a routine traffic stop, and all of a sudden they're happening," says Mr. Luka.

The American Civil Liberties Union has not called for a ban on devices such as Tasers. But in the light of studies that show potential health effects of getting jolted and a general lack of training, national standards, and federal oversight, the ACLU says the devices have created a troubling gray area for US civil rights.

"The Taser in many cases is going to be safe, but it's those other cases, which actually are prevalent in the population that police interact with, that we have a lot of concerns about," says Mark Schlosberg, an electroshock-weapons expert with the ACLU in San Francisco.

A federal National Institute of Justice study released in June drew this conclusion on devices such as Tasers: "Although exposure ... is not risk free, there is no conclusive medical evidence within the state of current medical research that indicates a high risk of serious injury or death from the direct effects of CED [conducted-energy device] exposure."

Still, the public shows signs of souring on the devices. Seven states have banned their use, and some police departments are reevaluating their stun-gun policies, specifically to wait for an imminent threat of physical violence before resorting to their use and to restrict officers to fewer than three jolts before moving on to hand-to-hand restraint. But for many police departments, critics say, electroshock weapons are routinely and increasingly deployed in a variety of situations, with plenty of room for questionable improvisation.

"Police sometimes do things they're not supposed to do, and if you put the temptation in front of them, if you tell 100 police officers that, 'Here's your Tasers, and you're not supposed to use them to punish,' someone is going to use them to punish. It's predictable," says Michael Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the New York State Police.

The Winnfield Parish case is likely to test all those aspects, highlighting racial tensions between blacks and police evident in many parts of the US. Roughly corresponding to overall crime data, 46 percent of the people who died in stun-gun-related incidents were black and 36 percent were white.

Winnfield Parish, birthplace of famed Louisiana Gov. Huey Long, has a long history of police corruption. The officer who administered the Taser to Pikes, Scott Nugent, was a rookie cop hired by a police chief who served time on a drug charge but was pardoned by former Gov. Edwin Edwards, who himself is now in federal prison.

A first cousin of Mychal Bell – the main defendant in the Jena 6 case that last year sparked the century's largest civil rights march – Pikes at the time of his arrest, on an outstanding warrant, struggled with police and then fell sick, complaining of asthma and the effects of PCP, police said after his death. But bystanders said Pikes, who knew the officers, pleaded with them, "Don't tase me again, please."

The Police Department has admitted no wrongdoing, though the City Council fired Nugent in May. The medical examiner is risking his relationship with the police department by listing the death as a homicide, but his autopsy was sound, according to Mr. Baden, who reviewed the findings.

"This is a major case," says Carol Powell-Lexing, a lawyer representing Pikes's family. "It's significant in the sense it shows how this young officer exceeded his authority and use of force, and it shows how dangerous those Tasers are. The community won't rest until they see appropriate relief in regards to this situation."

Use of stun guns widening

•More than 13,000 law enforcement, correctional, and military agencies in 44 countries deploy Tasers. Of this, some 4,700 agencies deploy Taser ECDs to all of their patrol officers.

•More than 359,000 Taser brand devices have been sold to law enforcement since February 1998.

•More than 176,000 T brand devices have been sold to citizens since 1994 (legal in 43 states).

•At least 276 people have died in the United States since June 2001 after being shocked with stun guns, according to Amnesty International.

Sources: Taser International, Amnesty International

Ex-sheriff's deputies in Mississippi charged in taser case

August 11, 2008
Associated Press

OXFORD, Miss. (AP) - Two former Tippah County sheriff's deputies - a father and son - pleaded not guilty Monday to federal charges they violated a suspect's civil rights and obstruction of justice. Federal prosecutors say the men, William and Jeffrey Rogers, assaulted a man in their custody by repeatedly jolting him with a Taser without justification. The former deputies also are accused of falsifying reports in an effort to thwart an investigation of the June 2007 incident. A federal grand jury indicted the pair July 31.

Illinois man dies

August 11, 2008
WIFR.com

Kiethedric Hines, 31, Rockford, Illinois died on August 10th

This is the SECOND taser-related death in Rockford, Illinois in two months.

ROCKFORD - Authorities detail investigation into the death of a man tasered by police.

Rockford Police say Kiethedric Hines, 31, tried getting into an apartment at 3319 1/2 Darwood Drive. His daughter's mother, who was inside at the time, called police. When officers arrived, Hines allegedly took off and police chased him a couple blocks over to Idlewood Terrace. Neighbors in that area say Hines jumped a fence before being tased by officers.

At a press conference Monday evening, Rockford Police Chief Chet Epperson said the officer who used the taser on Hines acted appropriately. Deputy Police Chief Greg Lindmark adds the police officers felt threatened and had to use the taser and pepper spray to subdue Hines.

The preliminary autopsy shows the shock from the taser did not kill Hines.

Loella and Robert Penzotti didn't see the actual tasing, but did notice Hines walking back to the patrol car and being searched by officers. Robert says, "Then all of a sudden he just kinda turned around and he slumped down to the ground, to the pavement actually, and he leaned back on the front tire."

At first the Penzottis just thought Hines was resisting arrest and didn't want to be put in the back of the car. Loella says, "You know how some of them don't want to get in the squad car and things like that so they fight against it. It never occurred to us that it could've been anything worse than that."

Hines died in the Emergency Room at Rockford Memorial Hospital while he was still technically in police custody.

This is the second taser death for the Rockford Police Department in just two months. InJune, Rockford police say 29-year-old Ernest Graves was seen running away from a domestic disturbance call on 16th Street. When police caught up with him, they tased him and he later died at the hospital. At the press conference Monday, Winnebago County Coroner Sue Fiduccia spoke about Graves' death. She says the autopsy showed no signs of heart attack, stroke, aneurysm or brain tumor. The autopsy did show there was cocaine, marijuana and alcohol in Graves' bloodstream. A toxicology report is still pending.

The two recent taser-related deaths have some wondering if tasers are the answer. "If it was only one this year, you might've thought it was just the person." That's why she thinks the department should really think twice about using the weapons to slow people down. "I think they need to reassess the thing as to the strength and what it's doing to people."

If final autopsy results show Hines' death was caused by the taser gun, Chief Epperson says his department is open to looking at policy changes on taser guns.

Saturday, August 09, 2008

Wecht to do second autopsy on man police tasered

August 9, 2008
By Jonathan D. Silver, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Let the battle of the forensic pathologists begin.

Dr. Cyril H. Wecht will perform a second autopsy on a man who died after a confrontation with Swissvale police. Howard Messer, a lawyer representing the family of Andre D. Thomas, yesterday confirmed that the noted forensic pathologist and former Allegheny County medical examiner has been retained by the Swissvale man's family.

An autopsy by the county medical examiner's office was inconclusive pending toxicology and other tests. However, both Medical Examiner Dr. Karl Williams and District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. have said Mr. Thomas' body bore no signs of excessive force.

Mr. Messer said photographs he has seen of Mr. Thomas's body tell a different story. "There is evidence of trauma to the body," Mr. Messer said. He declined to elaborate. Mr. Messer said he believed county officials were acting appropriately to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mr. Thomas's death Tuesday.

Dr. Wecht will likely perform the second post-mortem examination today between Mr. Thomas's funeral service and burial.

Dr. Williams also said it's not uncommon for families to request second autopsies, and he doesn't believe Dr. Wecht's examination will yield any dramatically new information. "We did a complete autopsy," he said. "The findings are the findings."

Mr. Thomas was pronounced dead at 12:46 a.m. Tuesday at UPMC Braddock, less than an hour after scuffling with three Swissvale police officers on Hawthorne Avenue. Police responded to numerous 911 calls of a man pounding on doors saying people were trying to kill him. Officers arrived, believing that Mr. Thomas might be a victim. But things changed when police decided that Mr. Thomas was acting so irrationally he was a danger to himself and others, Mr. Zappala said.

When Mr. Thomas tried to run away, one officer shocked him with her Taser three times until he was incapacitated enough to be handcuffed. Even so, Mr. Zappala said Mr. Thomas demonstrated "almost superhuman" strength in resisting attempts to handcuff him. Several witnesses said they saw police stomp and punch Mr. Thomas. Others told investigators from the Allegheny County Police that officers did not rough him up.

Mr. Zappala said Mr. Thomas's behavior and symptoms -- unusual strength, irrational behavior, dilated pupils, normal breathing that suddenly becomes labored and a normal pulse that rapidly weakens -- were similar to those exhibited in other people who died while in a state of "excited delirium" brought on by acute cocaine toxicity.

Investigators are looking into whether Mr. Thomas was high on the night of his death.

Toxicology tests are still weeks away from being available, but Mr. Zappala indicated that investigators were exploring the possibility that Mr. Thomas bought drugs in Braddock between 9 p.m. and 11 p.m., 50 minutes before his encounter with police. Paramedics at the scene treated him as a possible overdose.

Mr. Messer said Dr. Wecht will not be making any public statements about the results of his examination. "He's under a confidentiality agreement with me not to talk to the media about this case," Mr. Messer said.

However, in an interview Thursday before he was retained, Dr. Wecht expressed skepticism about excited delirium -- especially if there is any indication of excessive force or positional asphyxia. "Excited delirium is a convenient fallback for medical examiners, coroners and their forensic pathologists around the country," Dr. Wecht said. "The convenient thing about that diagnosis is that it's not susceptible to scientific disproof. It's not susceptible to scientific proof, either. It's based on nothing more than anecdotal situations."

In cases of positional asphyxia, prolonged pressure on the back or neck while someone is prone -- such as while they are being handcuffed and restrained -- can cause death.

Mr. Zappala flatly stated this week that Mr. Thomas did not die from positional asphyxia. He said one Swissvale officer did put a knee to the small of Mr. Thomas's back while detaining him, but that Mr. Thomas was then sitting upright.

In addition to setting up the possibility of dueling autopsy reports that reach different conclusions, the hiring of Dr. Wecht puts him squarely at odds with an old nemesis: Mr. Zappala. Dr. Wecht and Mr. Zappala have feuded for years, most significantly over the DA's successful move to end Dr. Wecht's ability to hold open inquests in cases of suspicious deaths. When Dr. Wecht was still county coroner, he would routinely hold fact-finding hearings when people died while in police custody or at the hands of police. Those inquests were conducted as an independent investigation parallel to police probes.

Mr. Zappala effectively outmaneuvered Dr. Wecht and put an end to open inquests. He argued that coroner's inquests were duplicative, illegal and unnecessary and could compromise law enforcement investigations.

Even this week, Dr. Wecht touted the importance of an impartial, transparent fact-finding hearing in the case of a death like Mr. Thomas's.

Friday, August 08, 2008

Judge doubts cause of death in Summit jail case

August 8, 2008
By Ed Meyer, Beacon Journal

Prosecutors failed to prove that Mark D. McCullaugh Jr. died from asphyxiation after his 2006 struggle with Summit County sheriff's deputies at the county jail, a judge said. Deputy Stephen Krendick, 35, was found not guilty of one count of murder by visiting Judge Herman F. Inderlied Jr., who heard the case in Summit County Common Pleas Court without a jury.

Inderlied announced the verdict at 4 p.m. Wednesday after a three-hour recess following closing arguments. He left the bench immediately afterward. The judge made public the reasoning behind his decision in a two-page court entry filed in the county clerk's office at 10:51 a.m. Thursday.

It stated: ''The state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any conduct of the defendant, Stephen Krendick, caused the death of Mark D. McCullaugh, knowingly or otherwise. More specifically, the state failed to prove that Mark D. McCullaugh died from asphyxia as opined by Dr. Sterbenz and Dr. Levy.''

Ryan Miday, a spokesman for Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason, said Inderlied did not inform the two assistant county prosecutors who handled the case — John R. Kosko and Brian M. McDonough — that lesser charges were considered. But Kosko and McDonough both interpreted the decision's reference to ''any conduct'' as an indication that Inderlied did consider lesser charges, Miday said. In pretrial records, Kosko wrote that ''the facts may support the consideration of involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide as lesser included offenses of murder.''

Inderlied's decision went on to say: ''It is more likely that Mark D. McCullaugh died from sudden cardiac death following his struggle with Summit County deputies and due to the adverse impact of that struggle on his pre-existing severe arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease prior to the use of drugs or the use of [pepper] spray by the defendant.''

Arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a medical term for hardening and thickening of the walls of the coronary arteries.

Defense's argument

Defense attorney James M. Kersey, in his closing argument, said McCullaugh's bad heart resulted in a fatal ''haywire heartbeat'' from the stress of the struggle. There was no evidence McCullaugh's airways were obstructed and, therefore, he could not have died from asphyxiation, Kersey argued.

But George C. Sterbenz, the county's chief deputy medical examiner, testified during the eight-day trial that McCullaugh died of asphyxiation from the combined effects of chemical, electrical and mechanical restraints on his airways. McCullaugh, 28, was pronounced dead at Akron General Medical Center at 7:46 p.m. Aug. 20, 2006 — one hour and 15 minutes after the beginning of the struggle in his 11-by-7-foot cell in the jail's mental health unit, prosecutors contended.

According to testimony, McCullaugh's hands were cuffed behind his back, his legs were shackled and he was injected by jail nurses with a drug cocktail in a further effort to calm him. One of those nurses, Denise Walsh, testified that McCullaugh's leg shackles were attached, in turn, to a bull ring in the cell floor.

With the cell door closed, Krendick then shot McCullaugh through a flap in the door with a 16-ounce can of pepper spray. Moments before, deputy Adam Crolley testified that he heard Krendick saying he was ''going to let him cook.''

Sterbenz testified that the fatal injury — severe burns to the windpipe from inhaling the pepper spray — caused McCullaugh to choke to death within minutes.

Those findings were corroborated by testimony from a second forensic pathologist, Dr. Bruce Levy, chief medical examiner of the state of Tennessee. Levy reviewed Sterbenz's findings and agreed with asphyxiation as the principal factor in the death.

The defense, however, presented two forensic pathology experts of its own — Werner U. Spitz, a former chief medical examiner in Wayne County in Michigan, and Michael Graham, chief medical examiner for the city of St. Louis.

Spitz and Graham both testified that McCullaugh, who was 6-foot-2 and 290 pounds, according to the autopsy, had severe heart disease and died of a rapidly accelerated heartbeat from the stress of his violent struggle with the deputies.

Spitz, 81, who testified in the congressional investigations into the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., concluded from his review of the Sterbenz autopsy that McCullaugh's death was from ''natural causes.''

Spitz testified that he found no obstruction in McCullaugh's windpipe, nor any evidence of swelling — a sign of restricted airflow — in that area.

Graham testified that he, too, reviewed Sterbenz's autopsy and found the evidence showed McCullaugh died from a condition he called ''schizophrenia-induced excited delirium,'' with heart disease as a contributing factor.

Excited delirium is a legal term for sudden death from an accelerated heartbeat in cases of suspects who resist being taken into custody.

Mental illness cited

Inderlied also said in his decision that the struggle ''was precipitated by Mark D. McCullaugh due to his well-documented mental illness.''

Krendick did not testify, but on Wednesday morning when the defense wrapped up its case, five Akron police officers testified that they were involved in bizarre incidents with McCullaugh in the weeks leading up to his death.

In one incident, McCullaugh head-butted an officer. In the other, he kicked a paramedic in the chest, the officers said.

Inderlied also said in his decision that he made ''no findings with regard to the conduct of any person(s) other than the defendant, Stephen Krendick.''

Four other sheriff's deputies were indicted in the case. They are scheduled to go to trial before Inderlied later this year.

After the verdict, Jennifer L. Fox, McCullaugh's mother, left the courtroom in tears. Jonathan Stock, of Medina, said his mother was too distraught to comment on the verdict.

Sheriff Drew Alexander, meanwhile, said Krendick will be back on the job ''when he's ready.''

Alexander extended his condolences to McCullaugh's family, but also said he was ''happy for the sheriff's office.''

''The agency's been under a lot of scrutiny for the last two years, and I felt two years ago as I do now,'' he said. ''My deputies acted appropriately.

''They did not go into that cell to kill that man. They went in to that cell to subdue him and stop him from hurting himself, and this is the end result.''

Inderlied handled the case under appointment by the Ohio Supreme Court.

Editorial - Shattering public trust

This is the same police department that will investigate its own (and, all too predictably, will find no officer at fault) in the recent post-taser death of 17-year-old Michael Langan.

August 8, 2008
Editorial - Winnipeg Free Press

There have been isolated, sporadic events in Winnipeg's history that have sorely tested citizens' faith in their police force. Never before has the city had to weather the travesty that played out before the Taman inquiry: A chorus of police officers repeatedly sang a "do not recall" refrain when asked about the drinking that went on during an all-night party that ended with Derek Harvey-Zenk plowing his truck into Crystal Taman's car. The inquiry has left Winnipeggers disgusted with the officers involved and with a growing distrust of the police force.

Harvey-Zenk's testimony Wednesday capped an arduous examination of the botched police investigation and subsequent plea bargain that allowed the former officer to escape drunk driving charges and dodge a jail term. Harvey-Zenk, who pled guilty to dangerous driving causing death, testified his memory of events now is full of "holes." The lapse covers a few hours before the "shifter" with his colleagues began at a Winnipeg restaurant, the following house party in East St. Paul and up to the day after he hit Taman at the red light on the highway early the next morning. Winnipeggers grew cynical as the credibility of police officers was dissected. Harvey-Zenk, finally, offered no contrition for his actions.

The seeds of this travesty were sown in the early bungling of the investigation by the East St. Paul police. Evidence was altered or omitted and the Winnipeg internal investigations unit was asked to interview the officers who partied with Harvey-Zenk. This creates the spectre of conflict, a predictable charge the police department will meet as long as the province refuses to establish an independent oversight body with powers to investigate the police force. Justice Minister Dave Chomiak firmly believes the police can investigate themselves. He is sadly blind to the widening mistrust the public has in the extraordinary authority that police wield.

The inquiry studied the decision of the independent prosecutor, Marty Minuk, to accept a plea bargain to the reduced charge of dangerous driving causing death, agreeing to spare Harvey-Zenk a jail term. The controversial move was aggravated when Mr. Minuk gave only a perfunctory explanation in court to the judge weighing the jointly recommended conditional sentence. Mr. Minuk chose the deal rather than risking losing the case, but his silence further undermined the public's trust.

The risks of losing the case were real. Had Mr. Minuk tested the evidence of impairment in court, however, the public would quickly have seen just where fault lay. Mr. Minuk's decision effectively eliminated a key step in keeping police accountable, and called into question the integrity of the justice system. Sometimes even weak charges should be tried in the interest of protecting public faith in the courts, something acknowledged in prosecution policy. This sordid case shows the value in that. It should caution prosecutors against striking deals in the future that can do lasting, perhaps irreparable damage.

Looking at deaths from arm's length

August 8, 2008
The Globe and Mail

When Craig McDougall died last week, he became the second aboriginal man to be killed by Winnipeg police officers in less than a month. Both Mr. McDougall's shooting death and the taser-inflicted death of Michael Langan will be investigated internally. Legitimate questions raised by leaders of aboriginal communities about the conduct of the Winnipeg police will not be answered satisfactorily without an external investigation, a procedure recommended by Manitoba's Aboriginal Justice Inquiry two decades ago.

Earlier this week, aboriginal leaders who demanded a public inquiry into the Winnipeg Police Service after the deaths of these young men were chastised by Winnipeg's mayor and told to wait for the facts. The province's Justice Minister expressed his faith in an internal investigation. But these recent deaths have raised doubts about the abilities and sensitivities of the municipal police force. If nothing else, the fact that the investigations of these deaths will be conducted by colleagues of the officers concerned will lead to a public perception of bias.

The soon-to-be-concluded public inquiry into the investigation and prosecution of an off-duty Winnipeg police officer convicted of dangerous driving, which caused the death of Crystal Taman, will not dispel that perception. Fellow officers can't remember how much Derek Harvey-Zenk was drinking, or if he was drinking at all. In any case, he had taken part in all-night partying. The police chief in nearby East St. Paul, where the collision took place, once worked with Mr. Harvey-Zenk. He can't remember telling his least experienced officer that Mr. Harvey-Zenk might be drunk. His officers failed to advise Mr. Harvey-Zenk of his Charter rights. In short, this inquiry invites an inference that the police cannot effectively investigate their colleagues.

In 1988, J.J. Harper, an aboriginal leader and Mr. McDougall's uncle, died after an encounter with a Winnipeg police officer, who was exonerated the next day. The Aboriginal Justice Inquiry was set in motion that year.

One of the AJI's recommendations was that where an incident involving a police officer resulted in the death or serious injury of a person, a special investigations unit or a team should investigate and report directly to the Minister of Justice. The investigating unit would not be staffed with any officers from the police department under investigation. Independent counsel - not a Crown attorney - would give advice on whether criminal charges should be laid.

Although an investigating police officer with the Winnipeg Police Service might reach an unbiased, accurate conclusion, the lack of independence will undermine it. The community and the officers themselves would benefit from a process that is seen to be fair. Implementation of the AJI recommendation for a special investigation team is long overdue.

California man dies

August 8, 2008
The Press-Enterprise, California

Lawrence Rosenthal, 54, Hemet, California - died on August 7th

September 20, 2008:
Riverside County coroner's officials said Lawrence Rosenthal died after a lack of oxygen to the brain from a cardiovascular heart disease. High levels of acute cocaine toxicity contributed to his death, the coroner's office said.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

PSP to market taser competitor in Canada

August 7, 2008
By Krystle Chow, Ottawa Business Journal

Pacific Safety Products Inc. has entered into an exclusive agreement to market Taser competitor Stinger Systems's electronic stun guns in the Canadian market.

The Kanata-based defence products maker said its wholly owned subsidiary APS Distributors would be marketing Stinger's "less lethal" electronic immobilization devices, including the new S-200 projectile stun device.

"We are extremely pleased to be partnering with Stinger Systems to bring this exciting and innovative product to Canada," said PSP chief executive David Scott in a statement. "We share a belief that superior product design, officer safety and customer service are critical in the Canadian marketplace, making for an ideal partnership. The S-200 especially represents a real opportunity for Canadian law enforcement to issue the best in less-lethal EID devices."

Stinger purports its products are safer than the Taser International stun guns – which have been receiving negative press lately after several highly publicized Taser deaths – widely used among law enforcement agencies. The two-dart, hand-held stun guns use microcomputer technology to manage the flow of current, allowing for less initial current and spreading the charge out over a longer period of time.

The Stinger product is also about half the price of a Taser device, according to an Associated Press report.

One step closer to a police state?

August 7, 2008
By John W. Whitehead
Tri-State Observer, Pennsylvania

"Power is in inflicting pain and humiliation." - George Orwell, 1984

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA - Compliance weapons, also known as non-lethal or non-deadly weapons, have become the rage in law enforcement.

On paper, these weapons seem like a welcome alternative to bloodshed, especially if it means protecting law enforcement officials from dangerous criminals and minimizing civilian casualties.

Yet as we have seen with tasers, the dangers posed, especially to defenseless non-criminals, cannot be lightly dismissed. And as technology makes possible the widespread availability and acceptance of these weapons, o­ne also has to wonder about their impact o­n police practices and the exercise of civil liberties.

Tasers, for example, are designed to cause instant incapacitation by delivering a 50,000-volt shock. Currently used by roughly 12,000 law enforcement agencies in the U.S., tasers have been hailed by law enforcement officials for their effectiveness in subduing targets. However, concerns about their misuse are growing. For example, Amnesty International reports that in instances where these hand-held electronic stun guns are used, 80% of the time they are used o­n unarmed suspects. In 36% of the cases, they are used for verbal non-compliance, but o­nly 3% of the time for cases involving 'deadly assault.'

Another non-lethal weapon with the potential to do untold damage is the 'LED Incapacitator' (LEDI). LEDIs will soon be in the hands of thousands of policemen, border agents and National Guardsmen. Designed like a flashlight, this light saber (also dubbed a barf beamer and a puke saber) is intended to totally incapacitate its targets by emitting multiple light frequencies and colors that confuse the brain, resulting in symptoms ranging from discomfort and disorientation to temporary blindness and nausea.

It has been suggested that LEDIs be installed in prisons so that riots can be stopped with the flip of a switch. Police vehicles with large versions mounted o­n top for riot control have also been proposed. But if LEDIs can be so easily employed o­n a mass scale and mounted o­n buildings, there is little that would stop police from dispersing even a mildly rowdy, but legal, political protest and shutting down entire city blocks with virtually no resistance.

Devices such as LEDIs facilitate a non-dramatic, palatable use of force. Indeed, the Department of Homeland Security has praised the LEDI device for its potential to peacefully apprehend boarder jumpers, resistant suspects and control riotous crowds. (Homeland Security has also expressed interest in yet another non-lethal weapon in the form of security bracelets, aka 'taser bracelets,' which could be used to control crowds, quell protesters and inflict pain compliance o­n suspects from a distance.)

But there is a serious problem with non-lethal, non-deadly weapons: how they are used or abused largely depends o­n the individuals and agencies operating them. For example, many police forces around the world unabashedly use tasers as compliance weapons rather than as alternatives to deadly force. In these countries, tasers are more often used against passive resisters and stubborn individuals, while more deadly force is reserved for armed offenders. Consequently, abuses are o­n the rise and opposition to tasers is mounting worldwide, especially given the sharp increase in sudden deaths accompanying use of the stun guns. In fact, in late 2007, the United Nations Committee Against Torture declared that the use of tasers constituted a form of torture.

Also, we know very little about these non-lethal weapons. For instance, despite assurances from Homeland Security that LEDIs cannot do any real damage, the research is still out o­n the long-term effects of many of these non-lethal weapons. As with tasers, which have resulted in nearly 300 deaths over the past few years, LEDIs might cause greater than expected damage to individuals who are especially susceptible to their effects.

Moreover, non-lethal weapons such as LEDIs may not reduce the number of shootings by police. In Houston, Texas, for example, the introduction and routine use of tasers did not reduce the number of people shot, killed or wounded by the police. Nevertheless, while the use of non-lethal weapons such as tasers and LEDIs may not necessarily reduce the number of civilian casualties, they have been largely accepted as the humane alternative to deadly force because they make the use of force appear far less dramatic and violent than it has in the past.

Contrast, for instance, the image of police officers beating Rodney King with billy clubs as opposed to police officers continually shocking a person with a taser. Both are severe forms of abuse. However, because the act of pushing a button is far less dramatic and visually arresting than swinging a billy club, it can come across as much more humane to the general public.

Without citizen awareness and outrage, a major check o­n the abuse of police power is lost. As we have seen with the use of tasers, this empowers law enforcement officials to resort to non-lethal weapons in situations where previously no force would have been used at all, such as routine traffic stops or peaceful protests. And as force becomes easier and more common, with police neutralizing masses of people for the slightest disturbance and o­nly facing relatively minor repercussions, constitutionally protected protests will be rendered useless.

There are also totalitarian ramifications to be considered. Governmental coercion is largely restrained by the fact that people will resist governmental violence that crosses a certain threshold. But when the threshold is subtle and justified under the rubric of being more humane or combating terrorism (as in requiring airline passengers to wear taser bracelets), it becomes more difficult to find the outrage necessary to oppose it.

Lest we forget, government domination is not usually accomplished by methods so dramatic that they spark a backlash from citizens. Thus, the real threat to freedom posed by such non-lethal weapons is a governmental system of coercion so well designed that it does not breed revolt.

Study looks into whether Swiss police should be armed with taser guns

August 7, 2008
World Radio Switzerland

A taskforce is looking into just how dangerous taser stun guns are and whether the police should be armed with them or not. There are concerns following several deaths in North America. Officials say federal guidelines will not change until a study is complete.

Swiss police task force to assess taser risks

August 7, 2008
World Radio Switzerland

There’s renewed debate in the Swiss press this week over the use of Taser guns, following the death two weeks ago of a Canadian teenager who’d been stunned by the electroshock weapon.

The 17-year-old died in Winnipeg – thousands of miles from Switzerland – but officials here say they’re examining cases like his in order to assess the risks posed by Tasers.

Their use is allowed in a number of Swiss cantons, in particular larger cantons such as Bern and Zurich. And that number is steadily increasing, according to Urs Geissbühler, the secretary-general of the conference of cantonal police commanders. Speaking to WRS’s Catherine Allen, Mr Geissbühler says a task force is currently assessing the dangers of Taser guns – but that for now, there are no statistics on how they’re being used across the country as a whole.

Plans to sign UN torture protocol sparks taser debate in Australia

August 7, 2008
ABC News, Australia

The Federal Government's decision to sign the Protocol to the UN's Convention Against Torture has the potential to put Australia's police in a difficult position.

The UN Committee Against Torture says the use of Tasers "causes acute pain, constituting a form of torture".

The Taser is an electronic stun gun with a 50,000-volt punch, that paralyses its target. They are used by police in several Australian states and one high-profile lawyer says the Government's decision to sign up to the UN protocol could make their use illegal.

Australian Council for Civil Liberties president Terry O'Gorman says Tasers are now being used by police in Western Australia, Queensland and New South Wales. Police in Victoria are campaigning for them too.

Mr O'Gorman says they are used every day. "[There was] an incident on the Gold Coast recently where the police were chasing a fellow who hadn't stopped for some mundane reason," he said. "They couldn't catch up with him so they Tasered him. The use of the Taser, which is touted as an alternative to the police drawing their gun and shooting, is being used in ordinary, everyday, mundane, policing situations."

He says very little parliamentary scrutiny has been applied to the decision to issue police with Tasers, but the signing of the protocol against torture could change that.

"It clearly is extremely painful. The United Nations have said that it is a form of torture so the Federal Government has got to grab this whole issue with both hands and address the widespread growing use of Tasers in at least three of the eight state and territory police services in this country," Mr O'Gorman said.

He expects the signing of the UN protocol will strengthen the legal argument against Tasers in Australia, and says it puts the onus on the Federal Government to take action on the issue.

"Deaths in Australia are inevitable. There is clear evidence that the use of Tasers leads to death," he said.

"The fact that Australia is now signing up to the UN protocol, which describes Tasers as a form of torture, just means that this has a degree of urgency which needs to be addressed by at least the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General, which is an overarching body which looks at these sorts of issues over the country."

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Police complaints in British Columbia need fixing now

August 6, 2008
Times Colonist, Victoria

The police complaints process in B.C. is not working. People who feel they have been wronged by police cannot count on a proper investigation or a timely response.

That has been known at least since February 2007, when former appeal court justice Josiah Wood's report revealed major breakdowns in the process and urged speedy action to fix the system. Almost 18 months later, the government has failed to act on a single recommendation. Solicitor General John van Dongen says it is considering changes, but offers no timeline for action.

The government is failing the public and police officers by preserving a process that relies on flawed and inadequate investigations and allows complaints to drag on for years without resolution.

Consider two cases in Victoria.

On Sept. 10, 2005, a constable shot an unarmed man in the stomach during a struggle in Esquimalt. The shooting was investigated, as required under the act, by an officer from another department -- in this case, Port Moody's police chief. It took a full year for Crown counsel to decide no charges were warranted. It took another 11 months for the Victoria Police Department to schedule a disciplinary hearing. On the day before the hearing -- 28 months after the shooting -- the officer resigned.

Even then, the department refused to release information on the shooting until the B.C. police complaint commissioner pressured it. The officer, the Victoria Police Department revealed, had thought he was grabbing his Taser and instead pulled his gun and shot the man. (He recovered.)

On April 23, 2004, Thomas McKay was injured in Victoria police cells. His father believed police used excessive force, throwing his son to the concrete floor while his hands were cuffed behind his back. He received a serious head injury.

McKay's father filed a formal complaint four days after the incident with the Victoria department. It took 19 months for police to respond, saying they had investigated and found the officer had done nothing wrong.

The police complaint commissioner reviewed the report and found further investigation was required. Within three weeks he asked Victoria police to re-examine the case. It took the department another 10 months to respond, saying it had looked at the facts again and reached the same conclusion.

Police Complaint Commissioner Dirk Ryneveld then ordered a public hearing, which began last month -- more than four years after the event.

Delays are not the only problem. As part of his review, Wood audited the handling of 294 complaints against the 11 municipal police departments covered by the provincial policy. (RCMP detachments, even those providing municipal policing, do not accept the province's complaint process.)

Almost one in five complaints was not properly investigated, he found. In some cases, complaints that should have been upheld were dismissed.

And the more serious the complaint, the more likely the investigation was to be flawed. The audit found 38 per cent of complaints of excessive force were not properly investigated.

Last week, Ryneveld expressed his concerns with the government's failure to address long-standing problems with "urgently needed" reforms. The B.C. Civil Liberties Association and other advocacy groups announced they would boycott the police complaints process and instead support people with complaints in filing civil legal actions.

Van Dongen explained the inaction by saying the issues are complex. But Woods offered 91 specific recommendations. Government's job is to deal with complex challenges, not put them off for years.

We give police great responsibilities and great power over people's lives in recognition of the important, difficult and sometimes dangerous work they do on our behalf.

Those powers must be balanced by an effective review process when citizens feel they have been abused or mistreated. That is in the interest of police and the public.

That balance does not exist in British Columbia.

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Pennsylvania man dies

August 5, 2008
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Andre Thomas, 37, Swissvale, Pennsylvania, died on August 4th

Monday, August 04, 2008

Texas man dies

August 4, 2008
Fred Davis, Beaumont Enterprise

Jerry Jones, 45, Beaumont, Texas

Makers of tasers aiming to appeal to public

"The idea is to get the weapon in front of soccer moms." ... Steve Tuttle, Taser International

"The natural progression for this is it's going to be in department stores." ... Steve Tuttle, Taser International

"We want to make sure the good guys have this." ... Steve Tuttle, Taser International

August 4, 2008
Rick Armon, Akron Beacon Journal

TravelCenters of America offers everything imaginable that a highway traveler might need. Fuel. Hot showers. Satellite radio systems. Full-service restaurants. Truck repairs. And now . . . Tasers.

The national chain has teamed up with Taser International to sell the stun gun at its 163 truck stops, including sites in North Canton and Lodi.

It's the first time in years that the Taser has been sold in a retail setting other than a sporting goods or firearms store. The move is part of the company's strategy to market the weapon to a more mainstream audience and eliminate the perception that Tasers are reserved for law enforcement authorities only.

TravelCenters of America provides great exposure because travelers are often concerned about personal security, especially if they are on the road alone, Taser spokesman Steve Tuttle said.

About a year ago, the majority of sales were direct to customers, but the company has started selling them in sporting good stores and through firearms dealers. The idea is to get the weapon in front of soccer moms, Tuttle said. "The natural progression for this is it's going to be in department stores," he said.

TravelCenters workers at the North Canton and Lodi sites declined to comment. The
weapons weren't on display last week, but the workers said they were behind counters and available for purchase.

A corporate spokesman didn't return a phone call after asking first to listen to the questions posed by a reporter. The company, based in Westlake, operates under the names TA and Petro in 41 states and Canada.

A spokesman for the Ohio Trucking Association said the trade group had no opinion on the deal.

"I think that people who are on the road feel less secure than people who are in their home area," said Dale Lewison, professor of marketing at the University of Akron and director of the Taylor Institute for Direct Marketing. "From that standpoint, it would be a reasonable fit that a truck stop operation would do that."

How they work

Tasers, which provide incapacitating 50,000-volt electrical shocks, have been controversial because people, including several in the Akron area, have died after being shocked by authorities. Amnesty International has estimated that more than 291 people have died from Tasers in the U.S. since June 2001.

And critics have argued that the weapon should be banned.

Taser has been selling the weapon to the public since its inception, including through retailer Sharper Image at one point in the 1990s. But consumer sales never took off and the company focused on law enforcement instead, Tuttle said.

Now the company is attempting to move back into the mainstream market.

"Fear is a very powerful marketing appeal," Lewison said.

However, he questioned how well the Taser would sell at a department store. Instead, it likely would do well at Kmart or Wal-Mart, he said.

Since the C2 Taser was introduced in July 2007, 31,600 have been sold. Ohio is one of the top five states for Taser sales, Tuttle said. The C2 Taser being sold at TravelCenters, sporting goods stores and on the company Web site for $349.95 differs from the law enforcement version. That main difference involves range, which is limited to 15 feet for the consumer.

The range is shorter because the company wanted the weapon to be "defensive in nature," Tuttle said.

The Taser also won't work when taken out of the box. The customer first must obtain a special code by undergoing a criminal background check and providing personal information to the company, he said. Whenever it is used, it also sprays coded confetti that allows law enforcement to identify the weapon.

"We want to know who you are," Tuttle said. "We want to make sure the good guys have this."

Mixed feelings

Paul Hlynsky, president of the Akron lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police, said he has mixed emotions about more people owning Tasers. "We respect the right of citizens to try to defend themselves," he said. "But our officers are very well trained on Tasers. Certainly it's a concern that people will get hurt and will hurt other people."

Man shot to death after taser fails, Winnipeg police say

August 2, 2008
CBC News

A 26-year-old knife-wielding man was shot and killed by police in Winnipeg after they failed to subdue him with a Taser, officials say. Police responded to calls of a possible disturbance around 5:15 Saturday morning in the 700 block of Simcoe Street in the west part of the city.

When officers arrived, they confronted a man brandishing a knife, said police spokeswoman Const. Jacqueline Chaput. She said police requested that he put down his weapon.

"Information of course is preliminary, but it does appear he did not comply with the request, the electronic control device was deployed, that didn't work and they had to escalate to a higher level of force," Chaput said. She said the officer shot the man as a last resort. He was taken to hospital, but died later. At least two officers were being placed on administrative leave.

Sunday, August 03, 2008

Letter from a concerned citizen

Attention: Alok Mukherjee
Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

Dear Chairperson Mukherjee,

As a concerned citizen, the site below should interest you, Vice-chair Pam McConnell, and other members of the Board concerned about the continuing use of Tasers by the Torronto Police Force. To date, 367 Taser deaths have been reported in North America - 22 in Canada, approximately 350 in the United States.

Many Taser victims have been psychiatric survivors - whom Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair has labeled "EDPs" (emotionally disturbed persons).

Tasers are neither safe nor "sub-lethal". Further, there is considerable medical-scientific evidence documenting the Taser's many serious health risks including cardiac arrest, arrhythmia, and death. Further, the relevant and negative medical evidence has been largely minimized, ignored or suppressed by Dr. David McKeown, Toronto's Medical Officer of Health, and Ontario coroners. Why?

As relevant evidence re Taser deaths, please read the powerful and personal statement [online] by Ms.Patti Gillman, sister of Robet Bagnell who died shortly after being tasered by Vancouver police in June 2004. Ms. Gillman delivered her statement on April 16, 2008 at a public meeting of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security in Ottawa. (click on url below, also "What We Believe" below photo of Mr. Bagnell.)

You will note that Manitoba Liberal leader Dr. Jon Gerrard has publicly called for an immediate "suspension on the use of Tasers" in Manitoba - the only political leader in Canada to do so. Once again, I urge the Board to recommend and issue an immediate moratorium, suspension or ban on police use of Tasers in Toronto. {see my previous submission delivered at a public meeting of the Board on September 28, 2006).

Please forward this letter to all Board members. I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,
Don Weitz
Toronto, Ontario

C: Patti Gillman
Councillor Pam McConnell, Vice-Chair, Toronto Police Services Board
Cameron Ward, B.C. Civil Liberties Union
Dr. David Williams, Chief Medical Officer for Health/Ontario
John Sewell, former Mayor of Toronto
Alex Neve, Secretary-General, Amnesty International/Canadian Section
Linden McIntyre, "the fifth estate"/CBC
"The National"/CBC
Fred Kuntz, Editor-in-Chief, The Globe and Mail
Ed Greenspon, Editor-in-Chief, The Toronto Star
Dr. Jon Gerrard, Leader, Manitoba Liberal Party

See http://truthnottasers.blogspot.com

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Manitoba Liberal Leader calls for suspension on taser usage

July 31, 2008
BREAKING NEWS - Winnipeg Free Press

Following a recent Taser related death, Manitoba Liberal Leader Dr. Jon Gerrard today charged the provincial government with continuing to put Manitobans at risk by failing to provide and implement guidelines for proper Taser usage.

"The lack of appropriate guidelines and standards for Taser usage creates a tough situation for law enforcement officers," Dr. Gerrard said. "I have called for a suspension on Taser use for some time now and recent events have reinforced this notion that Taser usage should be put on hold until proper guidelines and protocols are available and implemented."

On the afternoon of Tuesday, July 22, Michael Langan, 17, was shocked by a police Taser in a back lane behind 871 William Ave. He was rushed to the nearby Health Sciences Centre in critical condition and was pronounced dead.

Langan was the first person to die in Manitoba after being Tasered by a police officer.

A fatal Taser incident in British Columbia in October 2007 sparked national outrage.

"This is an issue of humanity and the fact that a weapon labeled as non-lethal has on several occasions caused fatalities is ample reason to reassess the situation," Dr. Gerrard said.

Saskatchewan released its taser report, listing 21 recommendations including the call for a multi-disciplinary team with medical practitioners to analyze complied data on the human effects of Tasers.

Tasers have been used in Canada since 1999 and according to Amnesty International there have been more than 290 fatalities in North America following Taser shocks since 2001, approximately 22 occurring in Canada.