WELCOME to TRUTH ... not TASERS

You may have arrived here via a direct link to a specific post. To see the most recent posts, click HERE.

Showing posts with label chief constable paul battershill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chief constable paul battershill. Show all posts

Monday, September 22, 2008

Battershill saga: what happened to the police chief

September 21, 2008
Rob Shaw, Victoria Times Colonist

Just a year ago, Paul Battershill was the highly regarded police chief of the city of Victoria. He had a reputation as a progressive police officer -- Victoria Mayor Alan Lowe called him a "New Age kind of guy."

Then suddenly, on Oct. 11, 2007, he was placed on administrative leave, and on Nov. 6, he was suspended with pay while the RCMP investigated allegations of misconduct against him.

Eleven months later, Battershill resigned, five days before a scheduled disclipinary hearing. His resignation was accepted because the Victoria Police Board had suffered a "loss of confidence" in Battershill, Lowe said.

Until now there has never been a public airing of the allegations against the former chief. But today, for the first time, Times Colonist reporter Rob Shaw reveals the events that set in motion Battershill's downfall. Using sources who were present at the time, he has pieced together the heretofore secret events that led to resignation of the police chief.

The fall of Victoria police chief Paul Battershill started, oddly enough, at a meeting about crime in the city's downtown core. It was Aug. 29, 2007, and Mayor Alan Lowe was facing tough questions from the business community about rising petty crime and whether the police force had the money to continue boosted downtown police patrols.

Business owners told the mayor they loved seeing extra officers walk the beat to tackle the city's chronic street problems. But the mayor and the department warned that those extra bodies had to come from other units, and the budget was stretched thin.

Among those attending that night was businessman Gerald Hartwig, who owns numerous downtown buildings. Hartwig believed there was more money in police coffers than the mayor was suggesting and wondered how much had been spent on a series of severance packages for high-ranking officers in the last few years.

He hired lawyer David Mulroney to file Freedom of Information requests into Battershill's expenses and the costs paid for Battershill to travel to West Vancouver to oversee an investigation into a constable accused of drunk driving. At least six senior employees had been dismissed from Victoria's police force since Battershill became chief, and the FOIs, requested between Sept. 8 and 20, also asked to see the cost of their severance packages.

At first, the FOI requests were unimpeded as they wound their way through the system, Mulroney said. But on Oct. 2, Mulroney received a phone call from Murray Rankin, a Victoria partner in national law firm Heenan Blaikie, which was representing Battershill, to challenge the FOIs. Mulroney said he was surprised, because many of the expenses requested were Heenan Blaikie legal bills. He wrote the company a letter suggesting they were now in a conflict of interest.

But the phrase "conflict of interest" had a second meaning. Although the letter did not explicitly say so, it was widely known that Heenan Blaikie lawyer Marli Rusen was having an affair with Battershill while accepting contract work from him and the Victoria Police Board. Mulroney suggested Heenan Blaikie ask its partners about their relationships with the chief.

In the corridors of police headquarters and in the business community, people had been talking about the chief and Rusen, whom Battershill hired to provide labour advice for the 222 police employees then under his command. More than one officer heard admissions of the affair - and explicit details - from Battershill himself. The affair ran contrary to Battershill's public image. When he arrived in Victoria from the Vancouver Police Department to become chief in 1999, he quickly built a reputation as a progressive thinker, champion of reform and advocate of public transparency. Lowe called him a "New Age kind of guy."

If an officer was under internal investigation, Battershill would most often release the officer's name voluntarily to boost what he said was confidence in the department's accountability. In a 2002 interview, Battershill said: "We've built a relationship based on transparency and not hiding stuff."

Battershill's work also won praise from city hall. In 2005, with his reputation at an all-time high, Battershill was hired by Lowe to be acting city manager. It was the first time in city history that someone managed both the police force and municipal bureaucracy. Battershill even wore a gun on his belt at city hall following a death threat that forced police tactical team members to lock down city hall.

But two years later, Mulroney's letter to Heenan Blaikie set off a flurry of activity that ultimately would cause Battershill's downfall.

On Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007, Hartwig and Lowe met for coffee at a Victoria White Spot restaurant, where Hartwig said he showed Lowe the letter and passed on rumours and worries he'd heard from senior polce officers, many of whom are his friends. Lowe said he was concerned.

The next day, on Thanksgiving, the mayor met with senior officers to hear their concerns first-hand. The mayor asked if the officers would talk to the police board, the civilian body that oversees the police department, and the officers agreed.

The following day, Oct. 9, Hartwig's secretary hand-delivered Lowe a copy of Mulroney's letter in a brown envelope. Hartwig said Lowe had requested a copy and asked him not to tell anyone he had sent it.

Coincidentally, there was a regularly scheduled police board meeting later that day. The timing appeared key - Battershill was away in Halifax at a conference.

At the time, the police board had these seven members:

- Chairman Alan Lowe, Victoria mayor
- Vice-chairman Chris Clement, Esquimalt mayor
- Catherine Holt, a management consultant
- Kathy Mick, a former dental hygienist and vice-president of Dr. Dave Mick Inc.
- Bruce Gibson, a real estate agent at Newport Realty
- Maureen Meikle, former director of communication for the B.C. Pension Corp.
- Ken MacLeod, former assistant deputy minister of B.C. Municipal Affairs.

Ralston Alexander, a local civil lawyer, and Christine Stoneman, a management consultant, would join the board a little more than a month later and land smack in the middle of the controversy.

The police board is automatically chaired by the mayor of Victoria and vice-chaired by the mayor of Esquimalt. Both municipal councils also appoint an additional civilian member, not a politician.

The provincial government fills the other positions. Collectively, the board is supposed to be the department's boss, approving hires and fires, salaries, budgets and departmental priorities. It also hires the chief constable.

Although it had the potential to be explosive, the Oct. 9 board meeting fizzled into nothing. While the board discussed such things as financial reports, two nervous senior officers sat outside the boardroom at police headquarters waiting for Lowe to call them in to answer questions about their chief. It did not happen. Eventually they went home. The meeting ended with board members oblivious to the situation. "I was going to bring it to my board's attention, but I only had four board members there that day," Lowe would explain later. "You need to bring something like this up when everyone is there."

The next day, Mulroney's letter found its way to the media and was, literally, waved in the mayor's face as reporters asked for answers. Lowe was angry at the leak. "I would have preferred to handle it internally," he said. "We wouldn't have had all this media attention and wouldn't have had to put the Victoria Police Department through this."

Lowe summoned the police board members to his office at city hall to brief them. Battershill was piped in by speaker phone from Halifax. The board members told him they'd be meeting with senior officers that night to hear their concerns.

The board then called an emergency meeting at police headquarters and asked all senior inspectors and civilians in the department to attend - around nine or 10 people were present. One by one, the senior employees were led into the board room and questioned by the civilian board.

Some board members had already heard rumblings about what was about to occur.

The rank and file of the department had expressed displeasure toward senior management and Battershill after the suicide of a constable in September, sources said. The officer had killed himself after being informed by senior managers he was to be investigated for alleged misuse of a Taser. The suicide seemed to bring the crisis between Battershill and his senior managers to a head, even more so than the FOI request from Hartwig, sources said.

"It was precipitated by the businessman's letter, but it was on its way anyway, it was coming down the pipe," said a source with first-hand knowledge of the process.

Nonetheless, some board members expressed shock at what they heard in the meeting. Vice-chairman Chris Clement has called it one of the most extraordinary meetings he has ever attended.

In addition to Battershill's affair with Rusen, sources say other allegations heard by the board that night included:

- That Battershill had offered Insp. Cory Bond the job of police chief in the future if she supported his decision to get rid of the department's backup police boat, to save money. She interpreted this as inappropriate. The police board was unaware of the offer.

- That sometime in late 2006 or early 2007 Battershill had placed numbered locks on his office door and limited access to the office, including cleaning staff and his executive assistant. He had also placed a surveillance camera in the ceiling.

- That Battershill kept alcohol in his office, even though he knew the board had approved a policy prohibiting alcohol in the building and was waiting for the policy to receive provincial approval. Earlier that same year, 2007, he disciplined a West Vancouver constable who drank in her station and then drove drunk.

- That some senior officers were dissatisfied and worried that numerous colleagues had been dismissed without cause during Battershill's tenure as chief.

- That some officers were fearful of coming forward because they felt their careers were at risk and feared retribution by Battershill when he discovered who they were.

"It became obvious there was a severe loss of faith by senior management," said a source who was there. "Those men and women who came into the room that night were so severely concerned about the path the police department was taking that they were willing to put their jobs on the line."

Still, some of the senior officers and civilian employees had nothing bad to say when asked about Battershill and were unaware of the allegations by their co-workers. Some officers praised him, while others continue to believe certain allegations were unfounded, leaving a deep divide among working colleagues.

At the time of the meeting, the department had a deputy chief and seven inspectors beneath Battershill. Four of them - then deputy chief Bill Naughton, Insp. Cory Bond, Insp. Darrell McLean and Insp. John Ducker - refused to come back into police headquarters if Battershill remained as chief.

Shortly afterwards, in what would be one of his last public interviews, Battershill told the Times Colonist from Halifax the allegations were "wrong" and "spun" and he would address them when he returned.

The board took the ultimatum from senior staff, and their concerns about their jobs, seriously. Clement said the staff's lack of confidence in Battershill affected the board's confidence in him as well.

"You can't run a police department if your senior management refuses to show up because of their grievances with the chief," another close source said. "You do not have a police department that can function under that leadership.

"You can't ignore four of your most senior officers saying the same thing."

The eight-hour meeting finished after 2 a.m. on Thursday, Oct. 11. "At the end of the meeting that night, everyone agreed Battershill could not come back into the building," said one person in the room. "It was unanimous."

Lowe then e-mailed Battershill to tell him he had been placed on administrative leave, with pay. The chief was barred from the building, and his BlackBerry was blocked. The news spread quickly to the Halifax conference, where Battershill was giving a presentation on effective civilian oversight of police departments.

When Battershill returned to the city days later, Lowe said the two walked along the waterfront to talk. Lowe would not say what about. He said the meeting was in keeping with his role as the board's discipline authority for the chief.

The police board was left with two options - it could do its own investigation and make a decision as Battershill's employer about whether to fire him, or it could send the matter to the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner for review under the Police Act.

With its own investigation, the board could have set parameters and made its own decision about what to do with the chief. On the other hand, the complaint commissioner could provide a third-party review, and also limit whether the city and police department could be sued for wrongful dismissal.

Sources in the room say the board was divided on its decision, but ultimately chose to have Battershill's conduct investigated by the complaint commissioner.

On Nov. 6, Battershill's administrative leave was changed to suspension with pay as the RCMP began its investigation on behalf of the complaint commissioner. Naughton was promoted to interim chief, a position he has now held for almost a year.

To aid in the investigation, the board summarized approximately 13 points of concern for the complaint commissioner. However, since the Police Act deals with issues of public trust and code-of-professional-conduct regulations - such as deceit, corrupt practices, neglect of duty, discreditable conduct and abuse of authority - the investigators deemed that several of the staff concerns about personnel matters and management style were not applicable. The allegations were narrowed to seven, although the board was not told how or why, sources said.

Six RCMP investigators spent six months and 1,900 hours interviewing 37 people and examining 900 documents.

For months, the public heard nothing about the investigation, about who was interviewed, or even what the investigation was about. All Lowe said publicly was that the allegations against Battershill involved a "personnel matter."

On April 23, 2008, the RCMP submitted its final report, which concluded that only one allegation - the affair with Rusen, to which Battershill had admitted - was substantiated. The Mounties suggested Battershill be suspended. As a result, Lowe began negotiating with Battershill's legal team to schedule a disciplinary hearing, where the chief would be allowed to present his case before Lowe ruled on what kind of discipline, if any, he would impose on Battershill. Different dates came and went without progress, because Battershill requested more information and the lawyers kept negotiating details, Lowe has said.

The rest of the allegations pitted Battershill's word against that of his officers and could not be proven to a civil standard - the legal benchmark used by the Police Act, which is less than the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

The complaint commissioner also didn't examine whether Battershill had lost the confidence of his police board - which it seemed he had. According to members, the board viewed the affair as a direct conflict of interest, because Battershill was having a relationship with a person he had contracted, with taxpayer money, to give unbiased advice on sensitive labour issues for his employees, sources said.

Although Rusen denied the affair to Heenan Blaikie, and the RCMP investigation determined neither party profited by the relationship, the board was angered at the poor judgment Battershill showed, sources said. "Either he was having an affair or he wasn't, but the fact he told people he was makes it appear he has a serious conflict even if he's lying," a source said.

All the RCMP's investigative work made for a lengthy final report - but the board was never given a copy to read.

Instead, members received an oral summary from Lowe, a troubling fact for many members. In addition to his close working relationship with Battershill, Lowe had also been interviewed by the RCMP as a witness during its investigation. This prompted the police board to debate numerous times, at in-camera meetings, whether Lowe was in a conflict of interest and whether it was appropriate to get information filtered through him.

Despite the board members' concerns, B.C.'s Police Act didn't allow for an alternative. Under the act, the mayor is always the police board chairman and is the only person who can discipline the chief constable. He doesn't need to get the rest of the board's consent to discipline the chief, nor does he need to share all his information with members. Currently, the Police Act does not explicitly say whether he can delegate the disciplinary job to another person should he feel it necessary, although changes that would allow this are being drafted by the province.

After reading the complaint commissioner's report, Lowe began negotiating with Battershill's legal team, which included high-profile Vancouver lawyer Len Doust. On July 28, Battershill offered to resign, Lowe said.

Board members were not included in the negotiations, sources say, and only received word from Lowe when he had reached a settlement agreement.

Under the deal, Battershill received $15,000 for his legal bills, and both sides signed a non-disclosure clause that forbade them from talking about the issue. The board voted in favour of the deal and Lowe publicly called it a good arrangement for taxpayers.

On Aug. 13, Lowe held a press conference to announce Battershill's resignation, five days before he was to face a scheduled disciplinary hearing.

"The investigation completed by the RCMP did not find that Battershill had committed any criminal acts, had any involvement with any criminal activity, nor did it find any financial impropriety," he told media.

But Lowe's reference to a criminal investigation was a red herring. The next day, Police Complaint Commissioner Dirk Ryneveld told the Times Colonist that the RCMP investigation was never about criminal acts.

A review of Battershill's severance shows Lowe was required to make the carefully worded statement as part of the deal.

Lowe did not mention to the press the one substantiated allegation, the affair. He said the board suffered a "loss of confidence" in Battershill's leadership but would not elaborate on what that was.

Ryneveld's 12-page report, made public on Sept. 4, 2008, outlined the reasons for the decision not to hold a public hearing into the Battershill case and released excerpts of the RCMP investigation. It was this report that confirmed the substantiated allegation of the affair with Rusen and clarified that it wasn't the complaint commissioner's place to examine Battershill's management style or his grievances with staff. Ryneveld's report made passing references to camps, political motives and departmental infighting his agency was not willing to investigate.

But for Victoria and Esquimalt taxpayers seeking answers about the complicated 11-month saga, Ryneveld had nothing. He said he recognized the public's desire for details, but said an "exemplary" RCMP investigation, combined with Battershill's resignation, left "insufficient grounds to conclude that a public hearing is necessary in the public interest."

Ryneveld did address the thorny issue of Lowe's role as Battershill's disciplinary authority, noting that a mayor's dual role as police board chairman can be problematic because a police chief and mayor don't work at arm's length - they have a close relationship because they attend the same functions and talk frequently.

Yet Ryneveld concluded the fault lay with the provisions of the Police Act, and not with the mayor's actions. He said that Lowe's close ties with Battershill, and his RCMP testimony, didn't go outside the normal bounds of a police chief-mayor relationship and that, ultimately, Lowe acted appropriately.

Officially, Ryneveld's report was the end of the Battershill affair. There would be no public hearing, no disciplinary hearing for Battershill, no release of the full RCMP investigation, no official explanation of the allegations.

For their part, neither Battershill nor Rusen has returned numerous requests for comment from the Times Colonist.

The police board is looking for a new chief and have hired a company to help in the search.

Whoever it is will take command of a department that remains, by all accounts, bitterly and deeply divided by the Battershill issue, how it was handled and what allegations, if any, were true.

The new chief will also be subject to annual performance evaluations by the police board thanks to a new policy disclosed this month by the board members.

Lowe, who is not running for office again, has said he hopes to swear in the chief at the November police board meeting, tentatively scheduled for Nov. 11 - four days before a new mayor is voted into office in the municipal election.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

High profile Victoria police chief quits, discipline hearing cancelled

August 14, 2008
The Canadian Press

VICTORIA — Victoria is looking for a new police chief after the city's mayor announced the immediate resignation of embattled former chief Paul Battershill under mysterious circumstances.

Battershill has been on paid administrative leave since last October and was facing a disciplinary hearing next Monday, but what prompted the leave has never been made public.

Mayor Alan Lowe said Wednesday that Battershill's resignation means the hearing has been cancelled. Lowe wouldn't give details about what's behind Battershill's departure.

"I would like to announce today that the (Victoria Police) board has accepted the resignation of Paul Battershill effective immediately as a result of a loss of confidence in his leadership of the Victoria Police Department," said Lowe during a press conference at Victoria Police headquarters.

"The disciplinary hearing set for Aug. 18 will no longer proceed due to the resignation of Battershill," he said. "The police board will not be paying a severance to Battershill. We will contribute a sum of $15,000 towards Battershill's legal fees as part of the settlement agreement. The Victoria Police Board considers this matter closed."

But Lowe suggested the Battershill matter could still face public scrutiny. The office of B.C.'s police complaints commissioner is entitled to review the findings of an RCMP investigation it ordered and has the power under the Police Act to call a public hearing, he said. "A public hearing could be held if (the commissioner's) office believes that the issues are such that they are in the public interest," Lowe said.

Police Complaints Commissioner Dirk Ryneveld was not immediately available for comment.

Lowe said an RCMP investigation of the allegations, which were never made public, against Battershill found nothing criminal against the former chief. "The investigation completed by the RCMP did not find that Battershill had committed any criminal acts, had any involvement with any criminal activity, nor did it find any financial impropriety," he said.

Lowe did say the allegations against Battershill were a personnel matter, but refused to go further. Lowe said Battershill's annual salary was $167,000.

The mayor defended the actions of the Victoria Police Board, saying the board was looking to protect taxpayers with regards to the Battershill matter. "We as a police board have acted very appropriately and we are looking after the best interests of the taxpayers," he said. "There are some things within the last nine-and-a-half months that we are unable to disclose only due to the fact that we are bound by the settlement agreement at this time."

Lowe said he believes the police board had no other choice but to suspend Battershill.

Deputy Chief Bill Naughton will remain as interim chief, said Lowe, but the police board has already hired a firm to begin looking for a new chief, who should be hired by November. Naughton said the issues involving the chief proved challenging for the department's rank-and-file members, but the officers never wavered from their duties to the public. "This department has a long and proud history," he said. "The record of accomplishment since October speaks for itself," said Naughton, citing several successful police operations, including the arrest of suspects in connection with a deadly downtown shooting. Naughton said he has not seen the investigation reports on Battershill. He would not say if he will apply for the chief's position.

Battershill, a 20-year Vancouver city police veteran, became Victoria's chief constable in 1999. He was known for supporting innovative policing techniques and led high-profile reviews on the use of Taser stun guns by police and an investigation into alcohol-related incidents at the West Vancouver Police Department.

Ryneveld ordered the RCMP to conduct an investigation under the Police Act but refused to disclose the reason. The entire matter was under a news blackout until a sensitive legal document was leaked to the media last November.

Victoria lawyer David Mulroney said at the time he wrote a letter to the law firm that represents the police department suggesting possible conflicts of interest surrounding the police chief and his knowledge of freedom of information requests involving himself. Mulroney said he represents a client who filed several freedom of information requests that name Battershill and suggested a link between his client's information request and the RCMP's investigation.

The access requests targeted four areas, including the Victoria police department's dismissals without cause, suspensions with pay, expense accounts and employment contracts involving pay equity.

One package of documents Mulroney's client received revealed Battershill had credit card expenses of more than $90,000 since 2004. The documents also show the city paid up to $600,000 in severance to former police department members and officials. The request also asked for all expense and accounting records of the two high-profile reports compiled by Battershill. Mulroney has yet to receive those documents. He asked for all expenses and accounts from the Taser Technology Review conducted by Battershill and its preliminary recommendations in September 2004.

It also asked for all expenses and accounts relating to Battershill's investigation of Const. Lisa of the West Vancouver Police Department on behalf of the B.C. Police Complaints Commissioner.

Monday, December 10, 2007

Victoria police officer Darren Laur's "apparent or perceived" conflict of interest

In August 2005, I lodged a complaint with the British Columbia Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner (OPCC) to iterate my concern that, while engaged in permanent full-time employment as a peace officer with the Victoria Police Department, Sgt. Darren Laur was also employed by, and accepted financial benefits from, Taser International and that his acceptance of financial benefits from that company placed him in a conflict of interest. It was my belief that this conflict of interest compromised Sgt. Laur's participation in the "Taser Technology Review" and an external investigation into the circumstances of my brother's death, both commissioned by the OPCC.

On September 24, 2005, Robert Anglen - a reporter for The Arizona Republic - published an article entitled "Taser defends giving stock options to police." Mr. Anglen wrote: "Another officer who received Taser stock options is Darren Laur of the Victoria, British Columbia, Police Department. Laur has been a staunch advocate for Taser for years and helped write a report in 1999 that helped usher Tasers into Canada. According to court documents, Laur was given 750 stock options in 2001 for helping to design a holster for the Taser. Taser said he sold the options in 2003. In his deposition, Taser President Tom Smith said he did not believe any of the options granted to police officers represented a conflict."

On October 5, 2005, Victoria Chief Constable Paul Battershill clearly identified this issue as a public trust issue in a presentation to the Canadian Association of Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement National Conference. During his presentation, Chief Battershill noted that "Conflict of interest is now arising with police use of force people who privately contract. Ethics combined with declaration of conflicts. (Kerek [sic], Laur, etc.) This is going to get problematic unless very clear conflict guidelines are followed."

On October 6, 2005, Chief Constable Battershill wrote to advise me that my complaint did not disclose a recognized Public Trust; Service and Policy; or Internal Discipline default. To which I and lawyer Cameron Ward responded that Sgt. Laur committed a Public Trust default, and possibly a Service and Policy default, by placing himself in such a conflict of interest, and that Chief Battershill was obligated to characterize this complaint. We requested that the investigation proceed without further delay. Another letter from the Victoria Police Department confirmed that their position remained unchanged and my complaint was referred back to the OPCC for consideration and decision.

On January 9, 2006, the OPCC formally characterized my complaint as a "compound complaint" with both Public Trust and Service and Policy components and advised all parties, including Darren Laur, Chief Constable Paul Battershill and Mayor Alan Lowe (Chair of the Victoria Police Board). An investigation began.

Because Chief Constable Battershill was considered a "witness" in the investigation, Chief Constable Paul Shrive of the Port Moody Policy Department was named Discipline Authority for the complaint, with a mandate to review the final report and determine a course of action to follow.

On June 12, 2007, almost two years after the complaint was lodged, I received a letter from Alan Lowe, Chair of the Victoria Police Board, who said that the Board reviewed my complaint pertaining to the Service and Policy component and determined that the current policy did not adequately address current conflict of interest issues, nor did it meet public expectations of conflict of interest guidelines and disclosure processes. As a result, "significant recommendations to the Victoria Police Department Conflict of Interest policy were made that reflect the serious manner with which we consider the issue."

On July 3, 2007, I received a letter from Chief Constable Paul Shrive who found that no Public Trust complaint against Sgt. Laur was substantiated. He did, however, say that there was an apparent or perceived, but not an "actual" (what the hell's the difference?) conflict of interest given Sgt. Laur's past association with Taser International and he agreed that, in the circumstances, Sgt. Laur ought not to have been selected to participate in the Taser Technology Review.

He further expressed his view that, while it was beyond the ambit of his delegation, this matter was of great significance and should be addressed promptly. And while the inspector in charge of the investigation recommended that the Victoria Police Department or Chief Constable Battershill acknowledge to me and the public that Sgt. Laur was in a position of apparent or perceived conflict of interest and ought not to have been selected to participate in the Taser Technology Review, he found that this also fell outside the ambit of his delegation and said he must leave that matter to the discretion of the Victoria Police Department and Chief Constable Battershill. (To the best of my knowledge, neither Chief Constable Battershill nor his department has ever acknowledged this publicly. You read it here first.)

On July 6, 2007, Chief Constable Battershill sent copies of the Executive Summaries of the complaint investigation to me. In his covering letter, he agreed with the determination that Sgt. Laur was in a position of apparent or perceived, but not an "actual" (again, I fail to see the difference) conflict of interest and that in retrospect Sgt. Laur ought not to have participated in the Taser Technology Review. However, he felt it was "evident" that the perceived or apparent conflict of interest posed by Sgt Laur's previous dealings or associations with Taser International did not compromise the Taser Technology Review or the investigation into my brother's death. He noted current standards of public expectation with conflict of interest issues associated to public bodies, and where it is a reasonable expectation to not have had Sgt. Laur's participation.

Finally, he said that the implementation of policy change based on the recommendations from the Victoria Police Board would bring forward a consistency with public expectations on the issue of conflict of interest which police in general have not adequately addressed.

In a final letter from the Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner, the Deputy Police Complaint Commissioner wrote that one of the recommendations from the investigation was that the OPCC recommend that consideration be given to amending the BC Police Act to include a section dealing with conflicts of interest. He noted that the Ministry of the Solicitor General and Public Safety is currently undertaking a review of the Police Act and that separate correspondence would be forwarded to them with respect to this issue.

He noted that it was his view that the issues involving police officers and conflict of interest have not been previously or adequately dealt with and the types of policy changes seen as a result of this investigation are worthy of other police departments to take note of. He concluded by saying that this topic was placed on the agenda of the Canadian Association of Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement National Conference.

As I noted earlier, Taser President Tom Smith did not believe any of the options granted to police officers represented a conflict. It would seem that not everyone agrees.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Taser inquest shut down

September 15, 2006
Coroner's move shocks victim's kin
Petti Fong, Globe and Mail

VANCOUVER -- A B.C. coroner abruptly shut down the inquest into the death of Robert Bagnell and adjourned hearings for six weeks after the family of the victim tried to introduce a letter from the Victoria chief of police that raised concerns about the use of tasers.

The surprise announcement by coroner Stephen Fonseca caught lawyers off guard and shocked Mr. Bagnell's family who had travelled from Ontario and Prince Edward Island to attend. The inquest was to wrap up today after a two-week hearing before a five-man jury. The coroner announced the adjournment without the jury present and left the hearing before Cameron Ward, the family's lawyer, could file any argument or submission requesting the inquest continue. Mr. Fonseca also ordered a ban on the distribution of the letter from Victoria Police Chief Peter Battershill to Dirk Ryneveld, the police complaint commissioner. A copy of the letter was also sent to Vancouver Chief Constable Jamie Graham. Karen Johnston, a spokeswoman from the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor-General, said yesterday that there was an issue over the handling of third-party documents. "There's a confidentiality around those documents," she said. "The presiding coroner ordered an adjournment so he could seek clarification on that." Ms. Johnston said the issue was raised by legal representatives of parties with standing at the inquest, but declined to say which party had raised the objection. The reported parties with standing at the inquest are Mr. Bagnell's family, Tasers International Inc., the weapon's manufacturer and the Vancouver Police Department. Coroners counsel Chris Godwin declined to comment on why the inquest was shut down.

Mr. Ward said the letter is important and should be known to the jury. "The suppression of the letter is against public interest. The letter in my view has public safety implications," he said yesterday.

Mr. Bagnell's sister, Patti Gillman, and his mother, Riki Bagnell, have filed a civil suit against the Vancouver police.

Mr. Bagnell, 44, died from acute cocaine intoxication, according to the medical examiner, but his family believe that the use of a taser played a role in his death.

In earlier testimony, the jury heard from Mr. Bagnell's neighbours that he was violent the night he barricaded himself in the fifth-floor washroom of the hotel where he lived. A medical examiner and toxicologist had also testified that Mr. Bagnell had enough drugs in his system that night to cause his death. Police officers testifying at the inquest said that a fire on the first floor of the hotel created an urgency to the barricade situation four floors above where an emergency response team had been trying to get Mr. Bagnell to come out. Although police originally informed Ms. Bagnell that her son died of an overdose, a detective confirmed a month after his June 23, 2004, death that a taser was used. One month after confirming the taser use, police released information about the fire on the first floor of the hotel.

Patti Gillman said she was shocked to hear the inquest ordered shut down. "I can't believe we won't be able to walk away from here with the truth and some recommendations to prevent this from happening to others," she said. Ms. Gillman travelled from Ontario to attend the hearing and her mother came from Prince Edward Island.

The jury will also return to hear the rest of the testimony from witnesses including the emergency response team officer who fired the taser. The inquest is supposed to resume Nov. 6.

Victoria police chief says public should be part of Taser use discussion

The inquest into my brother's death was abruptly adjourned after we tried to introduce a letter from the Victoria chief of police that raised concerns about the use of tasers.

September 15, 2006
Canadian Press

The continued use of Tasers by police in Canada needs to be discussed in a wider forum than just the policing community, Victoria's police chief says. In a 2005 letter to Police Complaints Commissioner Dirk Ryneveld and copied to Vancouver Chief Const. Jamie Graham, Paul Battershill said he had "philosophical concerns about whether police 'by themselves' should be defining where the Taser (Nasdaq:TASR) belongs on the force continuum. "As various studies rapidly evolve, it may be necessary to change placement in the continuum and I am not convinced this can be done by police 'by themselves," he said.

Battershill said he arrived at that view after comments by Los Angeles Deputy Chief Michael Berkow at the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police meeting in Ottawa on Aug. 22, 2005. Berkow stated the Taser will ultimately end up as 'only' a specific alternative to lethal force.

"This requires further discussion," Battershill said.

Lawyer Cameron Ward agreed with the Victoria police chief that the issue of Taser use should be discussed in the public arena because the device, which delivers an electric shock, has safety implications.

Questions about the safety of Tasers have come in the wake of several deaths. However, the makers of the weapon say they're safe and the deaths resulted from other factors. The issue has been contentious in court cases across the country.
In Alberta, a police officer is on trial in Edmonton for assault over the use of a Taser. Const. Jeffrey Resler said in a statement to the Edmonton police internal affairs unit that he feared that the men he found in a hotel room on Nov. 27, 2003, had recently smoked methamphetamines or popped prescription pills. He said he believed that firing his Taser at two sleeping men was a safe way to wake them up.

In Ontario, a Chatham-Kent police officer faces assault charges in connection with an alleged incident in the booking room of police headquarters in Chatham. Sgt. Edmund MacLean, 58, is alleged to have assaulted and improperly used a Taser on a 33-year-old Chatham man who was being booked at headquarters on July 6.

Vancouver police say their officers unholstered their Taser weapons about once a week last year - a total of 52 times. The number includes not only when Tasers were used to deliver an electric shock, but also when they were deployed to get a suspect's attention.

Police defend the use of the weapon, saying they're safe and effective - saving lives and preventing injuries. Across Canada, at least six people have died after being shocked by Tasers, which fire two barbs attached to a wire that deliver a 50,000-volt shock on contact for up to five seconds. The weapon is meant to immobilize aggressors by shocking their muscles. Amnesty International has said the weapon should be banned until more tests are done to determine its safety. The human rights group said the guns can be deadly when someone is in a weakened state because of heart problems or drug use. Manufacturers of the Taser guns, now used by more than 50 police and correctional services across Canada, say their weapons have never been held directly responsible for a death. Taser International Inc. also says its weapons have saved more than 6,000 lives and are a safer alternative to police revolvers.