You may have arrived here via a direct link to a specific post. To see the most recent posts, click HERE.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Judge makes no recommendations after Alessandro Fiacco fatality inquiry

February 7, 2008
Trish Audette, Edmonton Journal

EDMONTON - There was no "causal" connection between a 33-year-old man being Tasered on Christmas Eve two years ago and dying soon after, an inquiry judge has ruled. On Dec. 24, 2005, Alessandro Fiacco was seen and heard thrashing and screaming in the streets of McKernan neighbourhood, complaining of bugs and snakes crawling over his skin. One of two Edmonton police officers who arrived on the scene shot Fiacco shot three times with a Taser in 17 seconds. Nearly half an hour later, when Fiacco was in an ambulance on the way to the University of Alberta Hospital, he went into cardiac arrest and died.

"Current medical (scientific) research (one has to wonder WHOSE research) shows Tasering does not cause death," Provincial Court Judge Fred Day said in a written decision released today. "That is, it is not a direct cause of death. (Google Ronald Hasse!) Whether further research will show otherwise remains to be seen. There is an ever-increasing body of anecdotal (anecdotal?! dead is dead) evidence about death due to Tasers. They tend to show casual rather than causal connection."

At the inquiry hearing last October into Fiacco's death, the medical examiner said more than five milligrams of cocaine per litre of blood was found in the area of the man's legs and groin during the autopsy. More than two milligrams of cocaine per litre was found in his heart. Anything higher than a single milligram of cocaine per litre of blood could be fatal. Toxicologists estimate a "line" of cocaine might make for 0.2 milligrams of cocaine per litre of blood. The official cause of Fiacco's death was acute cocaine toxicity, or a massive drug overdose.

The purpose of a public fatality inquiry is to examine the circumstances of a sudden death occurring when a person is in police custody, dealing with officers, or in another government institution. Judges look at whether there are policy changes to be made in the future, but can not rule on legal responsibility.

In this case, Day made no recommendations to prevent similar deaths because of a "complete lack of evidence that Tasering caused or contributed to" Fiacco's death. He also noted the Solicitor General recently issued new provincial guidelines on the use of the stun devices.

1 comment:

Shannon said...

Alessandro was an addict and he had battled with it for many years but the drug once it owned him, kept calling him back and he had a hard time not giving into it. I feel for anyone who has had to battle addictions of any kind.
But with this case and others who were tasered while on a substance, I can't understand why they ignore the fact that the taser finished them off, so wouldn't that be part of why they died. To completely rule it out??
Yes it sounds like he was oding on cocaine but had he not been tasered he probably would have lived through the excess cocaine.
I am not saying that Sandro was in the right, in fact he was in the wrong for taking it that far and putting himself into a public place like that but had other methods been used Sandro may have had a chance to clean himself up and live a productive life. He wasn't threatening anyone, he wasn't hurting anyone other than himself so why couldn't calming communication be used and a bit of time to calm the man down. He was asking for help not to be finished off. The police reacted forcely and impatiently which played a part in Sandros death and others. Isn't it strange that a man with a gun can have a standoff for hours with police and not get shot which puts police and public in danger. but a man asking for help under the influence of a substance is tasered in minutes......doesn't make sense.